WORLD SUPPORT FOR LIBYAN INDEPENDENCE.

On 24 February the Great Britain special forces supported by navy and aircrafts enter the air space of Libya in an act of agresion in order to support terrorist troops that are attacking Libyan people and government .The argument for this unparalleled infringement on a nation suzerainty : so called humanitarian mission.    This act of war was exactly what Fidel Castro predicted in 21 February : a western military intervention to subjugate Libyan oil and wealth.

In front of this all out assault on an independent country the world condemnation mounts : Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua and progressives organizations and mass media are strongly condemning  the latest imperialist invasion of Africa.

The Cynical Danse Macabre.

The policy of plundering imposed by the United States and their NATO allies in the Middle East has gone into a crisis. It has inevitably unravelled with the high cost of grains, the effects of which can be felt more forcefully in the Arab countries where, in spite of their huge resources of oil, the shortage of water, areas covered by desert and the generalized poverty of the people contrast with the enormous resources coming from the oil possessed by the privileged sectors.

While food prices triple, real estate fortunes and the treasures of the aristocratic minority reach millions of millions of dollars.

The Arab world, mainly Muslim in its culture and beliefs, has seen itself additionally humiliated by the imposition of blood and fire by a State that was not capable of fulfilling the basic obligations that were part of their origin, from the colonial order existing up to the end of WW II, by virtue of which the victorious powers created the United Nations Organization and imposed world trade and economy.

Thanks to the treason committed by Anwar El-Sadat at Camp David, the Palestinian State has not been able to exist, despite the UN treaties of November 1947, and Israel became a strong nuclear power, an ally of the United States and NATO.

The US Military Industrial Complex supplied Israel with tens of billions of dollars every year as well as to the very Arab States that were submitted and being humiliated by Israel.

The genie has escaped from the bottle and NATO doesn’t know how to control it.

They are going to attempt to wrest the most benefits from the regrettable events in Libya.  Nobody can know at this moment what is happening over there. All the figures and versions, even the most implausible ones, have been spread by the empire via the mass media, sowing chaos and disinformation.

It is obvious that inside Libya a civil war is brewing.  Why and how did this happen?  Who will pay the consequences? Reuters Agency, echoing the opinion of the well-known Nomura Bank of Japan, stated that oil prices could go beyond any limits:

“‘If Libya and Algeria suspend oil production, prices could reach a maximum of more than 220 dollars a barrel and OPEC’s inactive capacity would be reduced to 2.1 million barrels per day, similar to levels seen during the Gulf War and when values touched 147 dollars a barrel in 2008’, the bank asserted in an article.”

Who could pay that price these days? What would be the consequences in the midst of the food crisis?

The main NATO leaders are all worked up.  British Prime Minister David Cameron, ANSA informed, “…admitted in a speech in Kuwait that the western nations made a mistake in backing non-democratic governments in the Arab world.” One has to congratulate him on his frankness.

His French colleague Nicolas Sarkozy stated: “The extended brutal and bloody repression of the Libyan civilian population is disgusting”.

Italian Chancellor Franco Frattini stated as “‘believable’ the figure of one thousand dead in Tripoli […] ‘the tragic numbers shall be a bloodbath’.”

Hillary Clinton stated the following: “…the ‘bloodbath’ is ‘completely unacceptable’ and ‘it has to stop’…”

Ban Ki-moon spoke: “‘The use of violence in the country is absolutely unacceptable’.”

“…‘the Security Council will act according to whatever the international community decides’.”

“‘We are considering a series of options’.”

What Ban Ki-moon is really hoping is that Obama pronounces the last word.

The president of the United States spoke this Wednesday afternoon and stated that the Secretary of State would be leaving for Europe in order to agree with their NATO allies on the measures to be taken. On his face once could note the opportunity to spar with John McCain, the far-right-wing Republican senator, pro-Israel Senator Joseph Lieberman from Connecticut and the leaders of the Tea Party, in order to ensure the Democratic Party demands.

The empire’s mass media has prepared the terrain for action. There would be nothing strange about a military intervention in Libya; besides, with that, Europe would be guaranteed almost two million barrels of light oil per day, unless before that events would put an end to the leadership or the life of Gaddafi.

Anyway, Obama’s role is rather complicated. What will the reaction of the Arab and Muslim world be if blood should flow in abundance in that country as a result of that exploit? Would NATO intervention in Libya stem the revolutionary tidal wave surging in Egypt?

In Iraq, the innocent blood of more than a million Arab citizens was spilt when the country was invaded under false pretexts.  Mission accomplished!: proclaimed George W. Bush.

Nobody in the world would ever agree with the deaths of defenceless civilians in Libya or anywhere else. And I wonder: will the US and NATO apply that principle on the defenceless civilians that the unmanned Yankee planes and the soldiers of that organization kill every day in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

It is a cynical danse macabre.

Fidel Castro Ruz

February 23, 2011.

7:42 p.m.

OBAMA IS PREPARING TO INVADE LIBYA

On 23 of February United States President had stopped short of recognizing his plan to invade Libya and to take over control of rich oil and gas fields of the country. In a moment when United States hegemony in the Middle East is crumbling a stabile base of supply with energy is a necessity for US. Sponsoring a so called revolution , sending foreign mercenaries is a way to obtain all this . Cuban leader Fidel Castro unveils this plan to destroy Libya and take control over the oil rich country.

The NATO Plan is to Occupy Libya by Fidel Castro

Oil has become the principal wealth in the hands of the great Yankee transnationals; through this energy source they had an instrument that considerably expanded their political power in the world.  It was their main weapon when they decided to easily liquidate the Cuban Revolution as soon as the first just and sovereign laws were passed in our Homeland: depriving it of oil.

Upon this energy source today’s civilization was developed.  Venezuela was the nation in this hemisphere that paid the highest price.  The United States became the lord and master of the huge oil fields that Mother Nature had bestowed upon that sister country.

At the end of the last World War, it started to extract greater amounts of oil from the oil fields ofIran, as well as those in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the Arab countries located around them.  These became the main suppliers.  World consumption progressively increased to the fabulous figure of approximately 80 million barrels a day, including those being extracted on United States territory, to which later gas, hydro and nuclear energies were added.  Until the beginning of the twentieth century, coal had been the basic source of energy that made industrial development possible, before billions of automobiles and engines consuming the liquid fuel were produced.

The squandering of oil and gas is associated with one of the greatest tragedies, not in the least resolved, which is suffered by humankind: climate change.

When our Revolution arose, Algeria, Libya and Egypt were not yet oil producers and a great part of the abundant reserves of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran and the United Arab Emirates were still to be discovered.

In December of 1951, Libya becomes the first African country to attain its independence after WW II, during which its territory was the stage for important battles between the troops of Germany and theUnited Kingdom, conferring fame and glory on Generals Erwin Rommel and Bernard L. Montgomery.

Ninety-five percent of its territory is completely made up of desert.  Technology permitted the discovery of vital oilfields of excellent quality light oil that today reach one million 800 thousand barrels a day along with abundant deposits of natural gas.  Such riches allowed it to reach life expectancy that is almost at 75 years of age and the highest per capita income in Africa.  Its harsh desert is located over an enormous lake of fossil waters, equivalent to more than three times the land area of Cuba; this has made it possible to construct a broad network of pipelines of fresh water that stretch from one end of the country to the other.

Libya, which had a million inhabitants when it attained independence, today has somewhat more than 6 million.

The Libyan Revolution took place in the month of September of the year 1969. Its main leader was Muammar al-Gaddafi, a soldier of Bedouin origin who, in his early years, was inspired by the ideas of the Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser.  Without any doubt, many of his decisions are associated with the changes that were produced when, as in Egypt, a weak and corrupt monarchy was overthrown in Libya.

The inhabitants of that country have age-old warrior traditions.  It is said that ancient Libyans were a part of Hannibal’s army when he was at the point of destroying Ancient Rome with the troops that crossed the Alps.

One can agree with Gaddafi or not.  The world has been invaded with all kinds of news, especially using the mass media.  One has to wait the necessary length of time in order to learn precisely what is the truth and what are lies, or a mixture of events of every kind that, in the midst of chaos, were produced in Libya.  For me, what is absolutely clear is that the government of the United States is not in the least worried about peace in Libya and it will not hesitate in giving NATO the order to invade that rich country, perhaps in a matter of hours or a few short days.

Those who with perfidious intentions invented the lie that Gaddafi was headed for Venezuela, just as they did yesterday afternoon on  Sunday the 20th of February, today received an fitting response from Foreign Affairs Minister  Nicolás Maduro when he literally stated that he was “wishing that the Libyan people would find, in the exercise of their sovereignty, a peaceful solution to their difficulties, that would preserve the integrity of the Libyan people and nation, without the interference of imperialism…”

As for me, I cannot imagine that the Libyan leader would abandon his country; escaping the responsibilities he is charged with, whether or not they are partially or totally false.

An honest person shall always be against any injustice being committed against any people in the world, and the worst of all, at this moment, would be to remain silent in the face of the crime that NATO is getting ready to commit against the Libyan people.

The leadership of that war-mongering organization has to do it.  We must condemn it!

Fidel Castro Ruz

February 21, 2011

 

 

FIDEL CASTRO: LIBYAN SO CALLED REVOLUTION: A UNITED STATES PLOT

The NATO Plan is to Occupy Libya by Fidel Castro

Oil has become the principal wealth in the hands of the great Yankee transnationals; through this energy source they had an instrument that considerably expanded their political power in the world.  It was their main weapon when they decided to easily liquidate the Cuban Revolution as soon as the first just and sovereign laws were passed in our Homeland: depriving it of oil.

Upon this energy source today’s civilization was developed.  Venezuela was the nation in this hemisphere that paid the highest price.  The United States became the lord and master of the huge oil fields that Mother Nature had bestowed upon that sister country.

At the end of the last World War, it started to extract greater amounts of oil from the oil fields ofIran, as well as those in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the Arab countries located around them.  These became the main suppliers.  World consumption progressively increased to the fabulous figure of approximately 80 million barrels a day, including those being extracted on United States territory, to which later gas, hydro and nuclear energies were added.  Until the beginning of the twentieth century, coal had been the basic source of energy that made industrial development possible, before billions of automobiles and engines consuming the liquid fuel were produced.

The squandering of oil and gas is associated with one of the greatest tragedies, not in the least resolved, which is suffered by humankind: climate change.

When our Revolution arose, Algeria, Libya and Egypt were not yet oil producers and a great part of the abundant reserves of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran and the United Arab Emirates were still to be discovered.

In December of 1951, Libya becomes the first African country to attain its independence after WW II, during which its territory was the stage for important battles between the troops of Germany and theUnited Kingdom, conferring fame and glory on Generals Erwin Rommel and Bernard L. Montgomery.

Ninety-five percent of its territory is completely made up of desert.  Technology permitted the discovery of vital oilfields of excellent quality light oil that today reach one million 800 thousand barrels a day along with abundant deposits of natural gas.  Such riches allowed it to reach life expectancy that is almost at 75 years of age and the highest per capita income in Africa.  Its harsh desert is located over an enormous lake of fossil waters, equivalent to more than three times the land area of Cuba; this has made it possible to construct a broad network of pipelines of fresh water that stretch from one end of the country to the other.

Libya, which had a million inhabitants when it attained independence, today has somewhat more than 6 million.

The Libyan Revolution took place in the month of September of the year 1969. Its main leader was Muammar al-Gaddafi, a soldier of Bedouin origin who, in his early years, was inspired by the ideas of the Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser.  Without any doubt, many of his decisions are associated with the changes that were produced when, as in Egypt, a weak and corrupt monarchy was overthrown in Libya.

The inhabitants of that country have age-old warrior traditions.  It is said that ancient Libyans were a part of Hannibal’s army when he was at the point of destroying Ancient Rome with the troops that crossed the Alps.

One can agree with Gaddafi or not.  The world has been invaded with all kinds of news, especially using the mass media.  One has to wait the necessary length of time in order to learn precisely what is the truth and what are lies, or a mixture of events of every kind that, in the midst of chaos, were produced in Libya.  For me, what is absolutely clear is that the government of the United States is not in the least worried about peace in Libya and it will not hesitate in giving NATO the order to invade that rich country, perhaps in a matter of hours or a few short days.

Those who with perfidious intentions invented the lie that Gaddafi was headed for Venezuela, just as they did yesterday afternoon on  Sunday the 20th of February, today received an fitting response from Foreign Affairs Minister  Nicolás Maduro when he literally stated that he was “wishing that the Libyan people would find, in the exercise of their sovereignty, a peaceful solution to their difficulties, that would preserve the integrity of the Libyan people and nation, without the interference of imperialism…”

As for me, I cannot imagine that the Libyan leader would abandon his country; escaping the responsibilities he is charged with, whether or not they are partially or totally false.

An honest person shall always be against any injustice being committed against any people in the world, and the worst of all, at this moment, would be to remain silent in the face of the crime that NATO is getting ready to commit against the Libyan people.

The leadership of that war-mongering organization has to do it.  We must condemn it!

Fidel Castro Ruz

February 21, 2011

Romania – lovitura de stat din 1989. O dezbatere intelectuala romano-franceza

Romania – lovitura de stat din 1989

Articol de Gerard Lucon- Redactor Agoravox-Franta  publicat la 26.01.2011

Traducere de Nina Georgescu – Redactor Agoravox-Franta

Daca ne intoarcem la anii 1967-1989 sa ne amintim ca Romania se distanta de politica Pactului de la Varsovia si avea o alta pozitie fata de razboiul de 6 zile si de Cehoslovacia.  De mentionat este si apropierea a doua tari , Albania si Romania de China comunista , ea insasi aflata in plina revolutie zisa culturala.

Atunci cand primavara de la Praga a facut sa rasune glasul stangilor europene de sustinere a marelui frate sovietic , cand Ungaria amorsa o privatizare lina in anii 70 tocmai datorita inteligentei diplomatice a lui Janos Kadar , doua tari se inchideau putin cate putin , transformand teritoriul lor in ghetouri.

Sosirea la putere a lui Mihail Gorbaciov avea sa modifice legaturile dintre USA si URSS si datorita acestor legaturi avea sa se faca si sa se desfaca tari si regimuri si sa se formeze noi echilibre.  Din acest punct de vedere anul 1989 prezinta un model exceptional de redistribuire a cartilor de joc si de creare a unui un nou echilibru.  Apropierea USA-URSS a antrenat si o apropiere a serviciilor secrete franceze (DGSE) si engleze (MI 5) iar aceasta apropiere a avut ca scop , printre altele , sa atinga in mod direct istoria Romaniei.Prima etapa a fost decizia lui Ceausescu de a-l trece in dizgratie pe Ion Iliescu.  Acesta din urma era vazut ca un demn succesor in anii de plumb , pentru ca apoi , brusc , sa fie suspectat ca simpatizeaza  cu politica lui Gorbaciov (Perestroika).   Aceasta suspiciune a capatat forma cu ocazia unei discutii intre cei doi  sefi de stat , atunci cand Gorbaciov i-a cerut lui Ceausescu sa inceapa un proces de liberalizare a tarii.  Iliescu a fost legatura intre cele doua tari.  Ceausescu a inteles imediat miza si riscurile. El l-a indepartat pe Iliescu de careul demnitarilor si i-a opus un refuz categoric lui Gorbaciov. In fata atitudinei incapatanate a lui Ceusescu , Gorbaciov s-a inteles cu George Bush sa schimbe regimul din Romania si sa-l dea jos pe Ceausescu.

Intre cele doua mari puteri intelegerea a fost simpla.  Gorbaciov avea sa se ocupe de Romania iar Bush de America Centrala aflata atunci in plina efervescenta (Nicaragua si Salvador).  Ca proba a bunavointei celor doi , Gorbaciov obtine sustinere din partea serviciilor secrete franceze si engleze , USA sunt lasate libere iar URSS inceteaza de a mai aproviziona cu arme cele doua tari care sunt Nicaragua (sandinista ) si Salvador (Frontul Farabundo Marti).

Sub egida lui Ion Iliescu a fost creat la inceputul anului 1989 un Comitet al Salvarii Nationale care avea sa-i regrupeze pe cei care vor fi vazuti la televiziunea nationala imediat dupa fuga lui Ceausescu.  De acum bazele loviturii de stat erau puse.  Mai ramanea de facut in asa fel ca aceasta tentativa sa nu se transforme in razboi civil deoarece puterea dispunea de un imens dispozitiv intern : Securitatea si o armata comandata de generali care nu erau neaparat prosovietici.

Sustinut activ si material de catre serviciile secrete franceze , olandeze si engleze , Comitetul Salvarii Nationale se organizeaza , in Occident  incepe o campanie de informare cu privire la grozaviile regimului aflat la putere in Romania , cu privire la sistematizare , la mutarile fortate si  instalarea celor de la sate in imobile si trecerea la distrugerea satelor. Este ciudat faptul ca aceasta actiune inceputa inca din anii 1970 nu a prezentat interes pentru mediile de informare occidentale decat in 1989. O prima etapa este depasita prin ralierea elitelor de origine maghiara.  Acolo au fost activate serviciile secrete ungare , in acele zone unde aceasta comunitate era deosebit de numeroasa , in unele departamente atingand chiar 90 % din populatie.

O a doua etapa a fost usoara negociere cu opozantii regimului Ceausescu , atat cei din exil cat si cei consemnati la domiciliu in tara.  Toti au fost contactati , la toti li s-a promis un loc sub soare daca sustin lovitura. Toti au acceptat , toti aveau sa obtina locul promis sub soare si ceea ce este si mai strigator , nici unul dintre ei nu avea sa fie uscis in timpul evenimentelor din decembrie 1989.

A treia etapa a fost depasita atunci cand pe teritoriul Romaniei au intrat , incognito , persoane provenite din nord . In spatele acestora se afla marele frate sovietic.  Armata romana incepe sa fie intoarsa , inclusiv generalii care aveau sa apara un timp la guvernarea din 1990  (Stanculescu la aparare) pentru ca apoi sa serveasca de tapi ispasitori.  Generalii Stanculescu si Chitac aveau sa fie judecati si condamnati la grele pedepse cu inchisoarea pentru mortii de la Timisoara.

In schim generalul GEOANA ,  ( tatal lui Mircea GEOANA nefericitul candidat la alegerile prezidentiale din 2009 ) cel care comanda piata din Bucuresti in decembrie 1989 trece neobservat.  Ciudata impunitate.

La fel s-a intamplat si cu generalul Vasile Milea care mai are si azi o strada care-i poarta numele in Bucuresti , el care totusi a fost acela care a trimis tancurile impotriva taranilor in timpul revoltelor din 1962.  Cat priveste Securitatea , ea fusese deja contactata dupa caderea zidului Berlinului , apoi intalnirea de la Malta intre Bush si Gorbaciov la 3 decembrie 1989 a finalizat dosarul Romania.  Mai concret , Iulian VLAD , comandantul Departamentului Securitatii Statului ar fi fost atunci cooptat pentru a face parte din grupul pucistilor.

Toate plasele fiind intinse mai ramanea doar sa fie demarata operatiunea.  Acest lucru s-a facut la Timisoara mai intai la 17 decembrie , apoi la Bucuresti la 21 decembrie cand s-a produs un eveniment inimaginabil.  Ceausescu a fost huiduit in timp ce-si tinea discursul la tribuna in piata care mai tarziu avea sa se numeasca Piata Revolutiei.

In aceasta tara in care fiecare suspecta pe fiecare , in care fratele isi putea denunta sora , unde paznicul de la scara blocului raporta toate miscarile proprietarilor si locatarilor , unde toata lumea era in permanenta in garda , unde totul era notat , consemnat , iata ca dintr-o data o imensa multime il contesta pe dictator.  Cine poate crede in spontaneitatea acestei miscari ? Apoi povestea cu macelul de la Timisoara care a ocupat prima pagina in presa occidentala pana in ziua cand s-a demonstrat ca a fost vorba de o montare sordida , ca au fost dezgropate niste cadavre ca totul sa para mai adevarat .  Peste 50 de persoane au fost ucise la Timisoara la 17 decembrie , cadavrele au fost transportate la Bucuresti , apoi au fost incinerate.  Dintre aceste cadavre 40 nu au fost revendicate de nici o familie romana.  Ipoteza prezentei la Timisoara de agenti rusi pentru lansarea loviturii de stat porneste de la acest eveniment.  Aceasta ipoteza este mult mai credibila chiar daca ea nu are nici o legatura cu mortii de la Timisoara.

Intr-adevar , in lunile care au precedat lovitura de stat au intrat pe teritoriul Romaniei aproximativ 200 de agenti SPETZNAZ , trupe speciale de comando parti integrante ale GPU ( Serviciul de Informatii Militare al Armatei Rosii) care au ca misiune sa intervina in pregatirea pe teren a loviturilor de stat si a invaziilor.  Aceste trupe au fost deja prezente in Cehoslovacia in 1968 , in Afganistan in 1979 .  Omologii lor americani erau in Chile inaintea loviturii de stat a lui Pinochet.  In Franta , trista si celebra Coloana a 5-a germana a fost deosebit de activa in dezorganizarea spatelui frontului francez in 1939.

Aceste servicii secrete care nu exista de ieri , cum puteau ele sa nu fie prezente la o asemenea operatiune ?

Zilele de 21 si 22 dec.1989 au insemnat o cheie capitala pentru reusita sau esecul puciului deoarece Securitatea , care initial incepuse sa traga asupra multimii , a operat o retragere brusca si a lasat armata sa gestioneze manifestatiile , via Directiei de Informatii a Armatei DIA , actuala DGIA. In tot cazul in ce-i priveste pe rusi nici o negociere nu mai era avuta in vedere data fiind aceasta atitudine ambigua a Armatei si a Securitatii , iar GORBACIOV avea sa dea ordinul de debarasare fizica a lui Ceausescu.  Nu numai ca el stia prea multe , dar mai ales faptul ca Securitatea ar fi putut continua sa-l sustina , fie si numai partial , iar Armata , din cauza ca o parte din ea nu era sub controlul pucistilor , risca sa se intoarca impotriva manifestantilor si a Comitetului Salvarii Nationale.  De altfel unele din unitatile ei deschisesera deja focul , inclusiv asupra altor unitati militare (aeroportul de la Otopeni).  Riscul unui razboi civil era prea mare si s-a considerat ca eliminarea fizica a dictatorului este probabil cea mai buna solutie pentru a elimina , sau cel putin a diminua acest risc.

Pentru ca lovitura de stat s-a desfasurat asa cum s-a prevazut , acesti agenti SPETZNAZ au fost retrasi in tara lor in ianuarie 1990. Cu privire la tot ce s-a intamplat nimeni nu si-a pus intrebari , nici chiar mediile occidentale. Si asta pentru ca dezinformarea a functionat foarte bine.

Cu toate acestea , cand ne uitam la ceremoniile oficiale ale epocii , la cele organizate in toate tarile de Est , nu putem sa nu fim frapati de jovialitatea oamenilor , de drapele , de surasuri , de entuziasm.  Si de aici deducem ca acesti oameni erau autorizati sa manifesteze si selectati pe sprinceana. Cum ne putem imagina cu seriozitate ca nu a existat o triere a manifestantilor si o manipulare in zilele de 17 si apoi 21 decembrie ? 

Deci lovitura de stat a fost lansta. Si ea va reusi sa preia controlul asupra televiziunii nationale , in frunte cu un pretins opozant al regimului devenit actor in aceasta actiune , Mircea DINESCU.  Se va ajunge apoi si la judecarea si condamnarea la moarte a sotilor Ceausescu de catre un tribunal de ocazie , a carui sentinta , redactata anticipat de catre , printre altii , de Gelu Voican Voiculescu , membru al Comitetului Salvarii Nationale si de membrii juriului alaturi de Ion Iliescu si Petre Roman.  Povestea acestui Voican Voiculescu este interesanta.  Inalt , cu o barba frumoasa si lunga  a la Karl Marx , el a fost peste tot prezent desi nimeni nu-l cunostea.  Este prototipul de persoana care a intrat in joc pentru ca era informat si a ramas acolo participand la tot ce se facea .  A fost acceptat pentru ca era cu gura mare.  Participant la aceasta pretinsa revolutie , el a devenit vice-prim ministru datorita prezentei sale pe o fotografie de grup alaturi de Ion Iliescu.

In privinta lui Mircea Dinescu care a devenit multimilionar dupa , consemnarea lui la domicilia a fost pur formala.  Adevaratii opozanti erau incarcerati in inchisori speciale , de regula la Pitesti , iar altii erau eliminati fizic direct in inchisoare  (Gheorghe Ursu de exemplu). Altii erau transferati la munci fortate ( sapare la Canalul Dunarii) , altii intrasera in rezistenta si traiau in muntii Fagarasului unde unii din ei chiar au murit si in fine altii au fugit in strainatate.

Ceeace este fapt sigur este ca din acel moment Iliescu a preluat fraiele puterii.  Petre Roman a fost numit prim ministru , Voican Voiculescu avea sa fie numit mai tarziu Ambasador . Post deloc rau pentru unul care a facut ca presedintele  sa fie condamnat la moarte , ca apoi sa devina diplomat de cariera.   Povestea lui Petre Roman este si ea interesanta. Membru al nomenclaturii sub Ceausescu , el avea doua defecte pentru Elena Ceusescu : era evreu si se combinase cu fiica ei.  De aceea s-a decis sa fie trimis sa-si faca studiile in Franta , la Toulouse , ca sa se sparga relatia.  El avea sa revina in tara pentru a participa la aceasta « revolutie » si a fost transportat cu elicopterul de la Constanta la Bucuresti de serviciile de securitate.

Ati zis revolutie ?

Ceea ce putem extrage din aceste evenimente este ca prezenta trupelor speciale de comando sovietice si interventia omologilor lor frncezi , americani si englezi la nivelul armatei romane si a unei parti a conducatorilor Securitatii , a facut posibil sa se dispuna de o contra pondere enorma chiar in interiorul organelor de represiune.

Ceea ce mai putem adauga este ca in afara de serviciile secrete , chiar si ambasadele tarilor lor respective au fost locuri de agitatie si manipulare , inclusiv presa si mediile straine. Au fost patru ore de agitatie , cateva zile de impuscaturi in dreapta si-n stanga , 1500 de civili si cca. 50 de militari morti , iar la nivelul aparatului de stat , doi morti , Nicolae si Elena Ceausescu.

Cine mai indrazneste azi sa vorbeasca de revolutie ?

Acum cand bazele au fost puse , ar fi bine sa privim toate aceste lucruri care au fost subiecte de interes si de mobilizare in Occident dupa 1989  ( copii abandonati , copii strazii , SIDA , persoane cu handicap , coruptie , romii , adoptiile , prostitutia , pungasii ). Ar fi bine sa vedem si cum s-au adaptat si reciclat acesti fosti conductori , acesti fosti colaboratori si unde se afla ei acum : in guvernul roman , la Bruxelles , la Strasbourg , la Washington.  Nu au lipsit nici unele caderi in dizgratie.   Un ziarist roman , acum decedat , Silviu Brucan , fost comunist , spunea ca Romania va avea nevoie de 20 de ani pentru a iesi din comunism in stil romanesc.  El era optimist .  Romanii care au peste 45 ani si care sunt la putere sunt fosti nomenclaturisti , iar cei care au mai putin de 45 de ani si care sunt la putere sunt fii acestora.

Traducere comentariu la articolul :  Roumanie , le coup d’Etat de 1989

OPINIA ROMANEASCA LA ACEST ARTICOL

Buna ziua domnule Gerard Lucon.

Articolul dvs. este foarte bun. Ati avut cu siguranta surse de informare bune iar informatiile pe care ni le-ati transmis sunt importante si ele au meritul de a demonstra ca evenimentele din decembrie 1989 care au avut loc in Romania nu au fost o Revolutie.  Mai exista inca in Romania si in strainatate numerosi ignoranti dar si oameni de rea credinta care , desi cunosc adevarul , afirma totusi contrariul.  Ei au cu siguranta un interes in ascunderea adevarului.  Dar asta este o alta problema. 

Exista totusi in articolul Dvs. o neconcordanta intre prezentarea faptelor , care de altfel este corecta , si anume :

–         sosirea la putere a lui Mihail GORBACIOV si legaturile dintre Statele Unite si URSS pentru a face si desface tari si regimuri , pentru a construi noi echilibre ;

–         apropierea dintre SUA si URSS care a condus si la o apropriere intre serviciile secrete franceza si engleze avand drept scop sa atinga istoria Romaniei in mod direct ;

–         sustinerea acordata de serviciile secrete franceze , olandeze si engleze Comitetului roman al Salvarii Nationale , etc.

deci repet , exista o neconcordanta intre prezentarea faptelor si concluzia la care Dvs. ajungeti : Lovitura de Stat.

Potrivit rezultatului obtinut prin cercetarile mele nu este vorba de o lovitura de stat ci de ceva mult mai grav , de un Razboi Secret avand drept scop , asa cum si Dvs. bine spuneti , de a schimba istoria.  Primul act care a simbolizat schimbarea istoriei a fost pangarirea drapelului national si de stat al Romaniei si decuparea stemei patriei noastre.  Drapelul a fost dupa aceea arborat in forma sa pangarita in locuri publice ca un trofeu al invingatorilor pe pamantul Romaniei socialiste.  ( 19 dec.1989 la Timisoara )

Acest Razboi Secret a fost realizat de catre serviciile secrete ale puterilor economice straine , cu ajutorul unor tradatori romani care au folosit metodele specifice ale serviciilor secrete cum ar fi capacitatea de manipulare a informatiei si dezinformarea maselor , diversiunea psihologica , radio – electronica si diversiune cu foc terorist impotriva poporului roman.

Or este bine cunoscut faptul ca dezinformarea si diversiunea in diferitele ei forme sunt arme de razboi.

Pentru o mai buna intelegere a evenimentelor din decembrie 1989 din Romania va prezint mai jos contextul in care s-a nascut Razboiul Secret ,

Pierderea prestigiului SUA in razboiul din Vietnam , grava si marea criza a Capitalismului din anii 1970 care afecta ansamblul societatii capitaliste aratau ca SUA si tarile capitaliste dezvoltate , cu fragilele lor democratii occidentale , nu mai puteau oferi o perspectiva pe plan national si mondial.  Capitalismul era intr-o disperare totala pentru ca nu mai putea face fata competitiei istorice cu Socialismul si democratia socialista care , intr-un timp istoric relativ scurt reusise sa se impuna ca sistem economic , social si politic pe plan mondial.

In aceste conditii , in timpul presedintiei lui NIXON , liderii politici americani si marii sefi ai oligarhiei financiare s-au intalnit la inceputul anului 1973 si au hotarat , in secret , ca singura solutie pentru scoaterea Capitalismului din marea sa criza economica a anilor 1970 este distrugerea , cu orice pret , a Socialismului la nivel global si simultan , si nu actionand in mod izolat si din timp in timp , cum s-a procedat pana in 1973 cand s-a consemnat infrangerea Statelor Unite in razboiul din Vietnam. In felul acesta solutia iesirii din criza a fost deplasata din interiorul Statelor Unite si al tarilor capitaliste dezvoltate in afara frontierelor lor. O decizie politica secreta a fost luata , potrivit careia lumea capitalista formata din SUA si tarile occidentale aliate trebuia sa actioneze in 5 directii de atac impotriva Socialismului , si anume :

Distrugerea sistemului politic si economic socialist

1. Recastigarea lumii a treia si restaurarea domintiei prin noi forme neo

coloniale.

1. Reconstructia fostelor piete de desfacere prin expulzarea societatilor

apartinand statelor socialiste.

1. Transformarea zonei tarilor care au cunoscut regimuri socialiste in

piata de desfacere pentru produsele industriale ale tarilor capitaliste.

1. Preluarea controlului asupra principalelor surse de energie : petrol , gaze carbune , energie atomica .

S-a hotarat ca realizarea acestor obiective sa se faca printr-un Razboi Secret al carui nume de cod american era “Covert Operation” , adica Operatiuni sub Acoperire.

Aceasta misiune secreta  a fost incredintata serviciilor secrete ale Statelor Unite si tarilor capitaliste dezvoltate membre NATO , precum si unor organizatii oculte  (GLADIO , etc.) Pentru punerea in opera a Razboiului Secret s-a facut un Plan care a fost aprobat de sefii statelor capitaliste interesate in distrugerea concurentei economice a sistemului socialist. Ofensiva occidentala impotriva tarilor socialiste europene a prezentat un interes deosebit pentru Administratia americana care a transmis principalilor sai aliati din NATO cele ce urmeaza :

“ Evenimentele din Europa se desfasoara rapid si este necesara o coordonare mai stransa intre statele membre ale NATO pentru a putea controla situatia si accelera cursul favorabil intereselor Occidentului.

In acest sens este necesara o redistribuire a rolului statelor occidentale si o mai mare implicare in actiunile care trebuie sa influenteze evolutiile in diferitele tari socialiste.  In aceasta situatie :  Statele Unite vor trebui sa se concentreze mai ales pe situatia din URSS ,  in timp ce R.F.Germania si Anglia trebuie sa se ocupe mai mult de problemele ce privesc R.D.Germania , Polonia , Cehoslovacia , iar Franta si Italia , de tot ce priveste Ungaria , Bulgaria si Romania.

Razboiul Secret ca ofensiva globala pentru distrugerea Socialismului a fost pregatit o lunga perioada de timp , incepand din 1973.  In momentul cand s-a considerat ca toate conditiile sunt indeplinite s-a decis scoaterea lui la lumina , declansarea lui in 1989-1991  in Europa si URSS , sub acoperirea de Revolutii , dupa principiul Dominoului .  Asa-zisele revolutii au fost :  revolutia sangeroasa din Romania , revolutia mai putin sangeroasa din URSS , revolutiile de catifea din Bulgaria , Cehoslovacia , RDG , Polonia si Ungaria.  Aceste revolutii au fost continuate dupa 1991 sub forma de revolutie portocalie in Ukraina si revolutia rozelor din Georgia.

Acest Razboi Secret a reusit pana in prezent sa distruga socialismul si oamenii din Europa si URSS.  Aceasta reusita nu ar fi fost posibila fara sustinere din partea unor unor inalti demnitari din tarile socialiste , chiar foarte inalti , din partea unor tradatori din cadrul serviciilor secrete socialiste , din partea resturilor nazismului care mai existau in aceste tari si din partea unei parti a diasporei din tarile socialiste.

Statele Unite au lansat un nou principiu in istoria natiunilor.  Ele au afirmat ca nu este tradator cel ce actioneaza impotriva securitatii nationale a propriei sale tari daca el se pune in acelasi timp la dispozitia Agentiei Centrale de Informatii a Statelor Unite : CIA.    Pentru CIA celelalte state nu au nici o valoare.

Distrugerea adversarului concurent printr-un Razboi Secret Global este o premiera mondiala in istoria razboaielor si a umanitatii.

Alexandr Radu Timofte , fost director general al Serviciului Roman de Informatii SRI  (1999-2005) descrie aceasta premiera mondiala in felul urmator :  “ In toata perioada de dupa razboi , prin metodele specifice ale Razboiului Secret ai caror actori sunt serviciile secrete , sfarsitul Razboiului Rece a fost accelerat si inamicul mondial , respectiv sistemul socialist instaurat pe 1/3 parte a planetei , a fost invins.  La scara istorica acest proces poate fi considerat ca fiind cea mai mare victorie a unui sistem informational secret “

Se poate observa ca solutia pentru scoaterea Capitalismului din cea de a doua sa mare criza a fost doar un paliativ pentru Statele Unite si Occident.

Situatia pe plan international s-a agravat , lumea este mai saraca si mai instabila , iar Capitalismul a intrat , prin intermediul Statelor Unite , in cea de a treia sa mare criza

Nina GEORGESCU                      Redactor Agoravox-Franta                Cercetator politic independent

SOUTH SUDAN INDEPENDENCE

Professor Anton Caragea, declaration on South Sudan Independence

 

I have received with enormous interest the official results regarding South Sudan Referendum on Self Determination . The people of South Sudan have spoken and have spoken with clarity on their desire to achieve independence. I congratulated the people and government of South Sudan on this historical result and I express my sincere appreciation on the peaceful and honorable way in which the referendum was organized and hosted. I also congratulate the President of Sudan H.E. Omar Al Bashir for the immediate and unconditional recognition of the South Sudan Referendum results.

I call upon all parties to manage a peaceful transition and to negotiate a comprehensible and honest agreement of all the pending issues between the two independent countries on basis of international law, in order to build as President Omar Al Bashir underlined a brotherly relation between the two countries.

I also expressed to President of Southern Sudan H.E Salva Kiir Mayardit, upon his request, the openness of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation to support the South Sudan efforts   on the path of independence and on building an open and free society, a democratic model for countries of Africa.

I also express our shared vision with High Representative for Foreign Policy and Security of European Union Catherine Ashton as it was laid out in the 7 of February European Union Communiqué that underlined the fact that : EU remains committed to engage both North and South Sudan in the promotion of democratic governance, respect for human rights and a peaceful and prosperous future for all Sudanese people. In this context, the EU will step up its dialogue with both North and South and is ready to play its part in underpinning the development of two viable states.

Professor Dr. Anton Caragea-Director of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation

 

High Representative Catherine Ashton- declaration on South Sudan Independence

 

“This is a historic moment for Sudan. The European Union (EU) commends the people of Southern Sudan and the Sudanese parties to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) on the peaceful and credible conduct of the Referendum on self-determination for Southern Sudan.

Despite many obstacles, the Sudanese Referendum authorities were able to organise a referendum in a timely and credible manner as witnessed by the EU Electoral Observation Mission. An overwhelming majority of registered voters participated and resoundingly expressed their determination to establish an independent state.

The EU fully respects the outcome of the Referendum as a true reflection of the democratically expressed wishes of the people of Southern Sudan. The EU looks forward to further developing a close and long-term partnership with Southern Sudan which is set to become a new state once the CPA expires in July 2011.

The EU welcomes the commitment of the Government of Sudan to respect the outcome of the Referendum.

In the coming months, the EU will continue to support the efforts of the parties to reach agreement on all outstanding CPA issues and the key post-referendum arrangements that will sustain the North-South relationship in the long term.

The EU remains committed to engage both North and South Sudan in the promotion of democratic governance, respect for human rights and a peaceful and prosperous future for all Sudanese people. In this context, the EU will step up its dialogue with both North and South and is ready to play its part in underpinning the development of two viable states.”

High Representative for Foreign Policy and Security of European Union- Catherine Ashton

INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION OF ROMANIA ON THE FOREFRONT OF WORLD SOCIAL FORUM 2011

On the sidelines of World Social Forum, held in Senegal capital -Dakar, under the supervision of  President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela , Evo Morales of Bolivia and President of Senegal  Abdoulaye Wade , the membership of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation of Romania (I.R.I.C.E. ) to the Committee  for a Parliamentary Assembly at United Nations and to the Council for In-depth Reform of the system of International Organization was approved . On behalf of the  Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation of Romania the two agreements where inked by Deputy Director of I.R.I.C.E professor M. Constantinescu according with the Letter of Agreement approved by Professor Dr. Anton Caragea , Director of  Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation of Romania .

We present you the documents approved at the World Social Forum 2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPEAL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY AT THE UNITED NATIONS

Humanity faces the task of ensuring the survival and well being of future generations as well as the preservation of the natural foundations of life on Earth. We are convinced that in order to cope with major challenges such as social disparity, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the threat of terrorism or the endangerment of global ecosystems, all human beings must engage in collaborative efforts.

To ensure international cooperation, secure the acceptance and to enhance the legitimacy of the United Nations and strengthen its capacity to act, people must be more effectively and directly included into the activities of the United Nations and its international organizations. They must be allowed to participate better in the UN’s activities. We therefore recommend a gradual implementation of democratic participation and representation on the global level.

We conceive the establishment of a consultative Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations as an indispensable step. Without making a change of the UN Charter necessary in the first step, a crucial link between the UN, the organizations of the UN system, the governments, national parliaments and civil society can be achieved through such an assembly.

Such an assembly would not simply be a new institution; as the voice of citizens, the assembly would be the manifestation and vehicle of a changed consciousness and understanding of international politics. The assembly could become a political catalyst for further development of the international system and of international law. It could also substantially contribute to the United Nation’s capacity to realize its high objectives and to shape globalization positively.

A Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations could initially be composed of national parliamentarians. Step by step, it should be provided with genuine rights of information, participation and control vis-à-vis the UN and the organizations of the UN system. In a later stage, the assembly could be directly elected.

We appeal to the United Nations and the governments of its member states to establish a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations. We call for all organizations, decision-makers and citizens engaged with the international common interest to support this appeal.

MANIFESTO FOR IN-DEPTH REFORM OF THE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

We, citizens of the world, determined to safeguard future generations from war, poverty, injustice, cultural uniformisation and environmental degradation,

DECLARE the particular seriousness of the problems and challenges facing humanity and, in particular, that

• the globalisation process is increasing the interdependence and complexity of world problems and widening the gap between rich and poor people; whilst markets become increasingly global, the influence of political institutions required for their democratic, equitable and effective functioning decreases every day

• the weakening and marginalisation of the system of international institutions as regards peace and security issues has led to unilateral use of force in recent armed conflicts (Iraq…), than promoting conflict resolution collectively and in accordance with processes and protocols established through the UN.

In this state of the affairs, we citizens proclaim that a fairer world is possible, and we reclaim our democratic entitlement to participate in global decisions that affect our lives every day. To this end, we

PROPOSE in-depth reform of the system of international institutions to guarantee:

• democratic governance of globalisation to contribute to resolving the grave problems and challenges that face our world;

• the eradication of poverty and the promotion of more equitable development and respect for cultural, natural and gender diversity;

• world peace and security, embracing human and environmental security, based on justice and freedom; and

• the establishment of mechanisms to enable the world’s citizens and civil society organisations to achieve direct representation and participation in global decision-making processes.

The pursuit of these goals requires a stronger, more democratic UN, placed at the centre of a consistent, democratic, responsible, effective system of international institutions. More specifically, we need to democratise the composition and decision-making procedures of UN bodies and agencies to ensure that they are effective and democratic. And we need to reform and integrate within the UN all other global multilateral organisations (IMF, WB, WTO, etc.). To achieve these objectives,

WE PROMOTE a process of:

Mobilisation of the world’s citizenry based, for example, on citizens and world organisations’ support for this manifesto so that it comes to the formal attention of the United Nations General Assembly with a request to call a world conference on the in-depth reform of the system of international institutions.