Centrul Diplomatic/Diplomatic Center

Centrul de Studii Politice si Diplomatie/ Center for Political Science and Diplomacy


Lisbon Summit will be surely remembered as one of the lost opportunity of the North Atlantic Treaty to reform and to obtain a new significance in the XXI century. Instead of this, the Summit concentrated on an unwinnable war in Afghanistan and lost the sight of the fact that already Taliban’s are a force that can’t be uprooted from the country. No mention of the corruption and inefficiency that is crippling afghan army and administration and is making unthinkable the time line of 2014 for redraw from Afghanistan. After days of planning to win a war that is already lost on the ground the Summit turn his attention on the much anticipated European defense shield construction. Here also the summit did not produced any new information, still the same countries Romania and Bulgaria are accepting the defense shield while there are all the indication that Turkey will refuse the military installation on here soil. The Russia – NATO discussion was a new failure of this summit: Russia wanted security concern alleviated and a meaningful discussion on defense shield. Instead of this Russia was proposed an anti-Iran and anti-China partnership and support for President Dimitry Medvedev reform plans against Prime Minister Vladimir Putin conservative agenda. The new security concept of NATO that should have prepared the alliance for the new century  is still  the old one discussed in Bucharest in 2008 plus for convenience two lines on global warming and on cyber terrorism.

Sarkozy defiance  towards Romanian President 

For Romania this a specially unfruitful summit as Romanian delegation goes unprepared to the summit and suffered serious humiliation from the part of    French and Italian delegation that refused even the protocol necessary contact. Supplementary Romania accepted the plan of missile defense shield without any security guarantee or material compensation (for comparison Turkey was offered a financial package of 40 billion euro for the same deal that Romania got nothing). Romanian national interests in Black Sea region where ignored but we received the honor of being the country that will head the next wave of antiterrorist war, a word    that is hiding the attack on Iran nuclear facilities. In conclusion if for Romania the Lisbon summit was an unprecedented humiliation for NATO it was a missed opportunity.

Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of The Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation adopted by Heads of State and Government in Lisbon

    1. NATO’s fundamental and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Today, the Alliance remains an essential source of stability in an unpredictable world.
    2. NATO member states form a unique community of values, committed to the principles of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The Alliance is firmly committed to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and to the Washington Treaty, which affirms the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.
    3. The political and military bonds between Europe and North America have been forged in NATO since the Alliance was founded in 1949; the transatlantic link remains as strong, and as important to the preservation of Euro-Atlantic peace and security, as ever. The security of NATO members on both sides of the Atlantic is indivisible. We will continue to defend it together, on the basis of solidarity, shared purpose and fair burden-sharing.
    4. The modern security environment contains a broad and evolving set of challenges to the security of NATO’s territory and populations. In order to assure their security, the Alliance must and will continue fulfilling effectively three essential core tasks, all of which contribute to safeguarding Alliance members, and always in accordance with international law:
      1. Collective defence. NATO members will always assist each other against attack, in accordance with Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. That commitment remains firm and binding. NATO will deter and defend against any threat of aggression, and against emerging security challenges where they threaten the fundamental security of individual Allies or the Alliance as a whole.
      2. Crisis management. NATO has a unique and robust set of political and military capabilities to address the full spectrum of crises – before, during and after conflicts. NATO will actively employ an appropriate mix of those political and military tools to help manage developing crises that have the potential to affect Alliance security, before they escalate into conflicts; to stop ongoing conflicts where they affect Alliance security; and to help consolidate stability in post-conflict situations where that contributes to Euro-Atlantic security.
      3. Cooperative security. The Alliance is affected by, and can affect, political and security developments beyond its borders. The Alliance will engage actively to enhance international security, through partnership with relevant countries and other international organisations; by contributing actively to arms control, non-proliferation and disarmament; and by keeping the door to membership in the Alliance open to all European democracies that meet NATO’s standards.
    5. NATO remains the unique and essential transatlantic forum for consultations on all matters that affect the territorial integrity, political independence and security of its members, as set out in Article 4 of the Washington Treaty. Any security issue of interest to any Ally can be brought to the NATO table, to share information, exchange views and, where appropriate, forge common approaches.
    6. In order to carry out the full range of NATO missions as effectively and efficiently as possible, Allies will engage in a continuous process of reform, modernisation and transformation.
    1. Today, the Euro-Atlantic area is at peace and the threat of a conventional attack against NATO territory is low. That is an historic success for the policies of robust defence, Euro-Atlantic integration and active partnership that have guided NATO for more than half a century.
    2. However, the conventional threat cannot be ignored. Many regions and countries around the world are witnessing the acquisition of substantial, modern military capabilities with consequences for international stability and Euro-Atlantic security that are difficult to predict. This includes the proliferation of ballistic missiles, which poses a real and growing threat to the Euro-Atlantic area.
    3. The proliferation of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, and their means of delivery, threatens incalculable consequences for global stability and prosperity. During the next decade, proliferation will be most acute in some of the world’s most volatile regions.
    4. Terrorism poses a direct threat to the security of the citizens of NATO countries, and to international stability and prosperity more broadly. Extremist groups continue to spread to, and in, areas of strategic importance to the Alliance, and modern technology increases the threat and potential impact of terrorist attacks, in particular if terrorists were to acquire nuclear, chemical, biological or radiological capabilities.
    5. Instability or conflict beyond NATO borders can directly threaten Alliance security, including by fostering extremism, terrorism, and trans-national illegal activities such as trafficking in arms, narcotics and people.
    6. Cyber attacks are becoming more frequent, more organised and more costly in the damage that they inflict on government administrations, businesses, economies and potentially also transportation and supply networks and other critical infrastructure; they can reach a threshold that threatens national and Euro-Atlantic prosperity, security and stability. Foreign militaries and intelligence services, organised criminals, terrorist and/or extremist groups can each be the source of such attacks.
    7. All countries are increasingly reliant on the vital communication, transport and transit routes on which international trade, energy security and prosperity depend. They require greater international efforts to ensure their resilience against attack or disruption. Some NATO countries will become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for their energy needs. As a larger share of world consumption is transported across the globe, energy supplies are increasingly exposed to disruption.
    8. A number of significant technology-related trends – including the development of laser weapons, electronic warfare and technologies that impede access to space – appear poised to have major global effects that will impact on NATO military planning and operations.
    9. Key environmental and resource constraints, including health risks, climate change, water scarcity and increasing energy needs will further shape the future security environment in areas of concern to NATO and have the potential to significantly affect NATO planning and operations.
    1. The greatest responsibility of the Alliance is to protect and defend our territory and our populations against attack, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance does not consider any country to be its adversary. However, no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its members were to be threatened.
    2. Deterrence, based on an appropriate mix of nuclear and conventional capabilities, remains a core element of our overall strategy. The circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely remote. As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.
    3. The supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the United States; the independent strategic nuclear forces of the United Kingdom and France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute to the overall deterrence and security of the Allies.
    4. We will ensure that NATO has the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against any threat to the safety and security of our populations. Therefore, we will:
      • maintain an appropriate mix of nuclear and conventional forces;
      • maintain the ability to sustain concurrent major joint operations and several smaller operations for collective defence and crisis response, including at strategic distance;
      • develop and maintain robust, mobile and deployable conventional forces to carry out both our Article 5 responsibilities and the Alliance’s expeditionary operations, including with the NATO Response Force;
      • carry out the necessary training, exercises, contingency planning and information exchange for assuring our defence against the full range of conventional and emerging security challenges, and provide appropriate visible assurance and reinforcement for all Allies;
      • ensure the broadest possible participation of Allies in collective defence planning on nuclear roles, in peacetime basing of nuclear forces, and in command, control and consultation arrangements;
      • develop the capability to defend our populations and territories against ballistic missile attack as a core element of our collective defence, which contributes to the indivisible security of the Alliance. We will actively seek cooperation on missile defence with Russia and other Euro-Atlantic partners;
      • further develop NATO’s capacity to defend against the threat of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction;
      • develop further our ability to prevent, detect, defend against and recover from cyber-attacks, including by using the NATO planning process to enhance and coordinate national cyber-defence capabilities, bringing all NATO bodies under centralized cyber protection, and better integrating NATO cyber awareness, warning and response with member nations;
      • enhance the capacity to detect and defend against international terrorism, including through enhanced analysis of the threat, more consultations with our partners, and the development of appropriate military capabilities, including to help train local forces to fight terrorism themselves;
      • develop the capacity to contribute to energy security, including protection of critical energy infrastructure and transit areas and lines, cooperation with partners, and consultations among Allies on the basis of strategic assessments and contingency planning;
      • ensure that the Alliance is at the front edge in assessing the security impact of emerging technologies, and that military planning takes the potential threats into account;
      • sustain the necessary levels of defence spending, so that our armed forces are sufficiently resourced;
      • continue to review NATO’s overall posture in deterring and defending against the full range of threats to the Alliance, taking into account changes to the evolving international security environment.
    1. Crises and conflicts beyond NATO’s borders can pose a direct threat to the security of Alliance territory and populations. NATO will therefore engage, where possible and when necessary, to prevent crises, manage crises, stabilize post-conflict situations and support reconstruction.
    2. The lessons learned from NATO operations, in particular in Afghanistan and the Western Balkans, make it clear that a comprehensive political, civilian and military approach is necessary for effective crisis management. The Alliance will engage actively with other international actors before, during and after crises to encourage collaborative analysis, planning and conduct of activities on the ground, in order to maximise coherence and effectiveness of the overall international effort.
    3. The best way to manage conflicts is to prevent them from happening. NATO will continually monitor and analyse the international environment to anticipate crises and, where appropriate, take active steps to prevent them from becoming larger conflicts.
    4. Where conflict prevention proves unsuccessful, NATO will be prepared and capable to manage ongoing hostilities. NATO has unique conflict management capacities, including the unparalleled capability to deploy and sustain robust military forces in the field. NATO-led operations have demonstrated the indispensable contribution the Alliance can make to international conflict management efforts.
    5. Even when conflict comes to an end, the international community must often provide continued support, to create the conditions for lasting stability. NATO will be prepared and capable to contribute to stabilisation and reconstruction, in close cooperation and consultation wherever possible with other relevant international actors.
    6. To be effective across the crisis management spectrum, we will:
      • enhance intelligence sharing within NATO, to better predict when crises might occur, and how they can best be prevented;
      • further develop doctrine and military capabilities for expeditionary operations, including counterinsurgency, stabilization and reconstruction operations;
      • form an appropriate but modest civilian crisis management capability to interface more effectively with civilian partners, building on the lessons learned from NATO-led operations. This capability may also be used to plan, employ and coordinate civilian activities until conditions allow for the transfer of those responsibilities and tasks to other actors;
      • enhance integrated civilian-military planning throughout the crisis spectrum,
      • develop the capability to train and develop local forces in crisis zones, so that local authorities are able, as quickly as possible, to maintain security without international assistance;
      • identify and train civilian specialists from member states, made available for rapid deployment by Allies for selected missions, able to work alongside our military personnel and civilian specialists from partner countries and institutions;
      • broaden and intensify the political consultations among Allies, and with partners, both on a regular basis and in dealing with all stages of a crisis – before, during and after.
    1. NATO seeks its security at the lowest possible level of forces. Arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation contribute to peace, security and stability, and should ensure undiminished security for all Alliance members. We will continue to play our part in reinforcing arms control and in promoting disarmament of both conventional weapons and weapons of mass destruction, as well as non-proliferation efforts:
      • We are resolved to seek a safer world for all and to create the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons in accordance with the goals of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, in a way that promotes international stability, and is based on the principle of undiminished security for all.
      • With the changes in the security environment since the end of the Cold War, we have dramatically reduced the number of nuclear weapons stationed in Europe and our reliance on nuclear weapons in NATO strategy. We will seek to create the conditions for further reductions in the future.
      • In any future reductions, our aim should be to seek Russian agreement to increase transparency on its nuclear weapons in Europe and relocate these weapons away from the territory of NATO members. Any further steps must take into account the disparity with the greater Russian stockpiles of short-range nuclear weapons.
      • We are committed to conventional arms control, which provides predictability, transparency and a means to keep armaments at the lowest possible level for stability. We will work to strengthen the conventional arms control regime in Europe on the basis of reciprocity, transparency and host-nation consent.
      • We will explore ways for our political means and military capabilities to contribute to international efforts to fight proliferation.
      • National decisions regarding arms control and disarmament may have an impact on the security of all Alliance members. We are committed to maintain, and develop as necessary, appropriate consultations among Allies on these issues.
    1. NATO’s enlargement has contributed substantially to the security of Allies; the prospect of further enlargement and the spirit of cooperative security have advanced stability in Europe more broadly. Our goal of a Europe whole and free, and sharing common values, would be best served by the eventual integration of all European countries that so desire into Euro-Atlantic structures.
      • The door to NATO membership remains fully open to all European democracies which share the values of our Alliance, which are willing and able to assume the responsibilities and obligations of membership, and whose inclusion can contribute to common security and stability.
    1. The promotion of Euro-Atlantic security is best assured through a wide network of partner relationships with countries and organisations around the globe. These partnerships make a concrete and valued contribution to the success of NATO’s fundamental tasks.
    2. Dialogue and cooperation with partners can make a concrete contribution to enhancing international security, to defending the values on which our Alliance is based, to NATO’s operations, and to preparing interested nations for membership of NATO. These relationships will be based on reciprocity, mutual benefit and mutual respect.
    3. We will enhance our partnerships through flexible formats that bring NATO and partners together – across and beyond existing frameworks:
      • We are prepared to develop political dialogue and practical cooperation with any nations and relevant organisations across the globe that share our interest in peaceful international relations.
      • We will be open to consultation with any partner country on security issues of common concern.
      • We will give our operational partners a structural role in shaping strategy and decisions on NATO-led missions to which they contribute.
      • We will further develop our existing partnerships while preserving their specificity.
    4. Cooperation between NATO and the United Nations continues to make a substantial contribution to security in operations around the world. The Alliance aims to deepen political dialogue and practical cooperation with the UN, as set out in the UN-NATO Declaration signed in 2008, including through:
      • enhanced liaison between the two Headquarters;
      • more regular political consultation; and
      • enhanced practical cooperation in managing crises where both organisations are engaged.
    5. An active and effective European Union contributes to the overall security of the Euro-Atlantic area. Therefore the EU is a unique and essential partner for NATO. The two organisations share a majority of members, and all members of both organisations share common values. NATO recognizes the importance of a stronger and more capable European defence. We welcome the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, which provides a framework for strengthening the EU’s capacities to address common security challenges. Non-EU Allies make a significant contribution to these efforts. For the strategic partnership between NATO and the EU, their fullest involvement in these efforts is essential. NATO and the EU can and should play complementary and mutually reinforcing roles in supporting international peace and security. We are determined to make our contribution to create more favourable circumstances through which we will:
      • fully strengthen the strategic partnership with the EU, in the spirit of full mutual openness, transparency, complementarity and respect for the autonomy and institutional integrity of both organisations;
      • enhance our practical cooperation in operations throughout the crisis spectrum, from coordinated planning to mutual support in the field;
      • broaden our political consultations to include all issues of common concern, in order to share assessments and perspectives;
      • cooperate more fully in capability development, to minimise duplication and maximise cost-effectiveness.
    6. NATO-Russia cooperation is of strategic importance as it contributes to creating a common space of peace, stability and security. NATO poses no threat to Russia. On the contrary: we want to see a true strategic partnership between NATO and Russia, and we will act accordingly, with the expectation of reciprocity from Russia.
    7. The NATO-Russia relationship is based upon the goals, principles and commitments of the NATO-Russia Founding Act and the Rome Declaration, especially regarding the respect of democratic principles and the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states in the Euro-Atlantic area. Notwithstanding differences on particular issues, we remain convinced that the security of NATO and Russia is intertwined and that a strong and constructive partnership based on mutual confidence, transparency and predictability can best serve our security. We are determined to:
      • enhance the political consultations and practical cooperation with Russia in areas of shared interests, including missile defence, counter-terrorism, counter-narcotics, counter-piracy and the promotion of wider international security;
      • use the full potential of the NATO-Russia Council for dialogue and joint action with Russia.
    8. The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and Partnership for Peace are central to our vision of Europe whole, free and in peace. We are firmly committed to the development of friendly and cooperative relations with all countries of the Mediterranean, and we intend to further develop the Mediterranean Dialogue in the coming years. We attach great importance to peace and stability in the Gulf region, and we intend to strengthen our cooperation in the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative. We will aim to:
      • enhance consultations and practical military cooperation with our partners in the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council;
      • continue and develop the partnerships with Ukraine and Georgia within the NATO-Ukraine and NATO-Georgia Commissions, based on the NATO decision at the Bucharest summit 2008, and taking into account the Euro-Atlantic orientation or aspiration of each of the countries;
      • facilitate the Euro-Atlantic integration of the Western Balkans, with the aim to ensure lasting peace and stability based on democratic values, regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations;
      • deepen the cooperation with current members of the Mediterranean Dialogue and be open to the inclusion in the Mediterranean Dialogue of other countries of the region;
      • develop a deeper security partnership with our Gulf partners and remain ready to welcome new partners in the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative.
    1. Unique in history, NATO is a security Alliance that fields military forces able to operate together in any environment; that can control operations anywhere through its integrated military command structure; and that has at its disposal core capabilities that few Allies could afford individually.
    2. NATO must have sufficient resources – financial, military and human – to carry out its missions, which are essential to the security of Alliance populations and territory. Those resources must, however, be used in the most efficient and effective way possible. We will:
      • maximise the deployability of our forces, and their capacity to sustain operations in the field, including by undertaking focused efforts to meet NATO’s usability targets;
      • ensure the maximum coherence in defence planning, to reduce unnecessary duplication, and to focus our capability development on modern requirements;
      • develop and operate capabilities jointly, for reasons of cost-effectiveness and as a manifestation of solidarity;
      • preserve and strengthen the common capabilities, standards, structures and funding that bind us together;
      • engage in a process of continual reform, to streamline structures, improve working methods and maximise efficiency.
    1. We, the political leaders of NATO, are determined to continue renewal of our Alliance so that it is fit for purpose in addressing the 21st Century security challenges. We are firmly committed to preserve its effectiveness as the globe’s most successful political-military Alliance. Our Alliance thrives as a source of hope because it is based on common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and because our common essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of its members. These values and objectives are universal and perpetual, and we are determined to defend them through unity, solidarity, strength and resolve.
    • It reconfirms the bond between our nations to defend one another against attack, including against new threats to the safety of our citizens.
    • It commits the Alliance to prevent crises, manage conflicts and stabilize post-conflict situations, including by working more closely with our international partners, most importantly the United Nations and the European Union.
    • It offers our partners around the globe more political engagement with the Alliance, and a substantial role in shaping the NATO-led operations to which they contribute.
    • It commits NATO to the goal of creating the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons – but reconfirms that, as long as there are nuclear weapons in the world, NATO will remain a nuclear Alliance.
    • It restates our firm commitment to keep the door to NATO open to all European democracies that meet the standards of membership, because enlargement contributes to our goal of a Europe whole, free and at peace.
    • It commits NATO to continuous reform towards a more effective, efficient and flexible Alliance, so that our taxpayers get the most security for the money they invest in defence.
  2. We, the Heads of State and Government of the NATO nations, are determined that NATO will continue to play its unique and essential role in ensuring our common defence and security. This Strategic Concept will guide the next phase in NATO’s evolution, so that it continues to be effective in a changing world, against new threats, with new capabilities and new partners:

    The citizens of our countries rely on NATO to defend Allied nations, to deploy robust military forces where and when required for our security, and to help promote common security with our partners around the globe. While the world is changing, NATO’s essential mission will remain the same: to ensure that the Alliance remains an unparalleled community of freedom, peace, security and shared values.

November 23, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, G20 Summit, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, International Relation, Islam, Latin America, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Orient, OSCE-Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Politics, Russia, United States | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Presedintele Bashar Al Assad este un prieten deosebit al poporului roman


In data de 10 noiembrie Presedintele Republicii Arabe Siriene , Excelenta Sa Bashar Al Assad, efectueza o vizita la nivel inalt in Romania pentru a afla mai multe detalii despre aceasta vizita ne-am adresat profesorului Anton Caragea, directorul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare  Economica, care a condus cea mai recenta delegatie in Siria si avut discutii la cel mai inalt nivel , discutii ce au facut posibila aceasta vizita.   

Intrebare : Domnule profesor ati condus o delegatie care a cunoscut in amanuntime Siria si care a deschis drumul catre aceasta vizita, ce sa asteptam de la Siria si de la vizita Presedintelui Bashar Al Assad ?

Prof.dr.Anton Caragea:  Siria este o ţară activă, interesată în colaborarea cu Romania , având un rol pozitiv  în rezolvarea problemelor din Orientul Mijlociu.   Siria este o ţară care lucrează de peste 60 de ani la stabilizarea regiunii, fie în Liban sau Palestina, influenţa pozitivă siriană se face simţită.

În plus Siria este ţara care oferă sprijin şi ajutor la peste 1,5 milioane de refugiaţi irakieni asigurându-şi astfel şi un rol în rezolvarea problemei irakiene. Siria are acum o economie stabilă, în perpetuă creştere, în deschidere faţă de pieţele străine.  În plus nu trebuie uitată evoluţia democratică a Siriei care cunoaşte alegeri multipartite, echilibrul politic, separarea puterilor în stat şi care se deschide tot mai mult către lume. Siria are toate atuurile pentru a deveni un punct important pentru Romania , pentru colaborare în toate domeniile: politic, economic, cultural etc.

Intrebare: Si vizita de maine ( interviul e din 9 noiembrie n.n) a presedintelui Siriei va ajuta aceste relatii ?

Prof.dr. Anton Caragea: Absolut , presedintele Bashar Al Assad este un vechi si deosebit prieten al poporului roman, in toata vizita noastra in Siria toti ministrii si toate oficialitatile siriene ne-au vorbit despre dorinta presedintelui Bashar Al Assad de a adanci cooperarea cu tara noastra. Suntem norocosi sa avem in fruntea Siriei o personalitate care iubeste si intelege Romania.

Vice-ministrul afacerilor externe al Siriei decorat cu ocazia vizitei delegatiei romane. 

Intrebare: Putem avea şi o bază economică a colaborării româno-siriene ?

Prof.dr.Anton Caragea : În cursul vizitei noastre în Siria am descoperit rapid că Siria poate devenii o piaţă care să atragă cc. 50.000 de turişti români anual şi poate trimite cel puţin 20.000 de turişti anual pe litoralul nostru, care suferă abandonat de turiştii străini, apoi putem colabora în domeniul bursier, unde Siria tocmai a deschis Bursa din Damasc un element fundamental pentru atragerea de capital şi bineînţeles piaţa siriană  are nevoie de produsele româneşti şi poate oferii la rândul ei pieţei româneşti produse alimentare ecologice, ieftine şi de calitate şi produse textile şi pielărie. Să nu uităm şi colaborarea în domeniul energetic unde Siria caută exploatarea rezervelor de petrol şi gaze de pe teritoriul său şi România are experienţă în acest domeniu.

Ministrul Turismului al Siriei decorat cu ocazia vizitei delegatiei romane. 

Siria este povestea de succes a Orientului Mijlociu şi România trebuie să fie parte la acest succes.  În concluzie pot doar spune că România şi Siria sau regăsit după 20 de ani cu aceeaşi disponibilitate de a colabora şi de a-şi construi un viitor. România trebuie să fie poarta prin care Uniunea Europeană se apropie de Siria.

November 10, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, International Relation, Islam, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Orient, OSCE-Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Politics, Religion, Romanian Revolution, Syria, Tourism, Travel, Turism, United Nations Global Compact | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment




The Republic of Macedonia and the Syrian Arab Republic established diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level yesterday afternoon in New York, at the 65th Session of the UN General Assembly. 

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Antonio Milošoski and his Syrian Colleague, Walid al Muallem, signed the Joint Communiqué which, in compliance with UN protocol, will be further distributed to all member states. 

According to the Communiqué, the relations between the two countries will be developed based on the principles of mutual understanding, friendship, non-interference in domestic affairs, as well as recognizing the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the two countries. Moreover, this act opens wider possibilities for cooperation between Syria and Macedonia in all areas of mutual interest to the two countries. During their talks, the two Ministers announced the possibility for a bilateral visit to the Republic of Macedonia by the Syrian chief of diplomacy in the course of the following year.

The initiative for establishing diplomatic relations with official Damascus was launched in April 2007 during Minister Milošoski’s official visit to Syria. Syria is the 129th country which has officially recognized the constitutional name of the Republic of Macedonia.

Ambassador of Republic of Macedonia in Romania -H.E Ljupco Arsovski 

November 10, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, International Relation, Islam, Leaders, Macedonia, Mass media, News, Open Letter, OSCE-Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Politics, Romanian economy, Syria, United Nations Global Compact, Universitati | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment



President of Turkmenistan , H.E. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov is THE MEN OF THE YEAR. 

On the occasion of the National Day of Turkmenistan celebration held at Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation of Romania it was publicly awarded the highest Romanian cultural distinction to H.E. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, President of Turkmenistan.

In rare ceremony members of academic corp, intellectuals and political leaders witnessed the signing ceremony of the Official Decree awarding the MEN OF THE YEAR title to President of Turkmenistan – H.E. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov.

On this occasion professor dr. Anton Caragea, director of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation held a short speech about the meanings of this important event: This title is seldom awarded and only after a very carefully examination, as the receivers are leaders of the century, there work all thou concentrated in a year is reflecting decades of actions and achievements with positive influence over peoples and countries. Plus we have to defend not only the prize prestige but also the importance of our Institute, considered this year as the second in importance Institute of International Relations in the world.

Among the reasons leading to awarding MEN OF TE YEAR to President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov where taken under consideration:

–         Constructing a sustainable economic growth in Turkmenistan , a rapid economic development and the construction of a solid free market economy based in the same time on the correct income distribution and with a highly development of social protection sectors.

–         The continuous development of social base of Turkmen people by investing in health and education sectors , investment and support that is responding to the most sacred and untouchable human rights such as the right to health ,education and productive life.

–         The continuous development and protection of cultural and historical patrimony of Turkmen people, the transformation of Ashgabat in the pivotal connection center between Europe and Asia and in a light-house of   development for the entire region.

–         Continuously supporting peace and security on world stage and in the Central Asia region by important and internationally resounding actions such as transforming Turkmenistan in a neutral state and obtaining international recognition of this statue and hosting in Ashgabat the United Nation Center for preventive diplomacy in Central Asia. The last being an important initiative not only for the region but also for the world keeping in mind the strategic importance of Turkmenistan .

It was also read the letter addressed by H.E. President of Romania Traian Basescu on the occasion of National Day of Turkmenistan celebration to H.E. President of Turkmenistan. In the letter the Romanian president is manifesting his best wishes for the people of Turkmenistan for the extraordinary achievements registered in the last years and invites President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov for an official visit in Romania in 2011. AlsoTraian Basescu is declaring in his letter that :  “Strengthening the bilateral political dialogue, the resumption of the Romanian-Turkmen cooperation in many spheres, including economic .., as well as agreements reached following our talks in Ashgabat on July 22, 2009, created the conditions for sustainable development of the relations between Romania and Turkmenistan .. and a visit Bucharest at a convenient time in 2011 to continue the high level bilateral dialogue and identify new cooperation projects for the benefit of the two peoples.”

Awarding the highest cultural distinction, the invitation for an official visit in Romania and the feelings expressed by Romanian cultural, academic and political elite are all witnessing for the fact that Romania –Turkmenistan is a model relation and is having extremely deep roots.


November 9, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, G20 Summit, Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, International Relation, Islam, Kazahstan, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Orient, OSCE-Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Politics, Religion, Romanian economy, Turkmenistan, United Nations Global Compact, Universitati, Universities | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment



OMUL ANULUI este Presedintele Republicii Turkmenistan Excelenta Sa Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov

Cu ocazia sarbatorii Zilei Nationale a Republicii Turkmenistan in cadrul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica a avut loc acordarea celei mai inalte distinctii culturale romanesti Presedintelui Turkmenistanului Excelenta Sa Dl. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov.

Astfel intr-o rara ceremonie profesori, oameni politici, reprezentanti ai corpului academic au asistat la semnarea decretului de acordare a premiului de recunoastere internationala  OM AL ANULUI ( MEN OF THE YEAR) pentru Presedintele Republicii Turkmenistan Excelenta Sa Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov .

 Cu aceasta ocazie prof.dr Anton Caragea, directorul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica a sustinut o scurta alocutiune  despre insemnatatea momentului:   „Acest titlu noi il acordam extrem de rar si numai dupa o indelungata analiza, deoarece cei care primesc acest titlu sunt lideri ai secolului , opera lor deşi concentrata intr-un an se reflecta in decenii de realizari si de actiune pozitiva asupra popoarelor . In plus avem de aparat nu doar prestigiul premiului, dar si al Institutului nostru , considerat al doilea Institut de Relatii Internationale ca activitate diplomatica la nivel mondial”. 

Printre motivele ce au dus la luarea acestei decizii in unanimitate se numara: 

–         realizarea unei sustinute cresteri economice ce a permis Turkmenistanului o dezvoltare rapida, construirea unei economii de piata solide dar bazate in acelasi timp de redistributia echitabila a veniturilor si cu un pronuntat caracter social 

–         dezvoltarea continua a bazei sociale a poporului Turkmen prin investitii in sanatate  si educatie , investitii ce raspund celor mai sacre si inalienabile drepturi ale omului: dreptul la viata, la sanatate si la educatie

–         dezvoltarea continua a patrimoniului cultural si istoric al poporului Turkmen, transformarea capitalei Ashabad  intr-un centrul de legatura intre Europa si Asia si intr-un pol de civilizatie si far de dezvoltare pentru intreaga regiune.

S-a dat totodata citire si scrisorii Excelentei Sale Presedintelui Romaniei Traian Basescu adresata, cu ocazia Zilei Nationale a Turkmenistanului, Presedintelui Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov . In scrisoare presedintele Romaniei adreseaza cele mai calde felicitari poporului turkmen pentru extraordinarele sale realizari si il invita oficial pe presedintele Turkmenistanului in vizita in Romania in 2011declarand ca: „aceasta va fi o ocazie pentru continuarea dialogului la nivel inalt si identificarea de noi proiecte de colaborare in beneficiul celor doua popoare.. intarirea dialogului politic bilateral , reluarea cooperarii romano-turkmene in mai multe sfere de activitate inclusiv in cea economica … toate au creat conditiile pentru o dezvoltare sustinuta a relatiei dintre Romania si Turkmenistan” .  

Acordarea celei mai inalte distinctii culturale romanesti si invitatia oficiala adresata Presedintelui Turkmenistanului de a vizita Romania si sentimentele exprimate de elita culturala si diplomatica a României, sunt toate dovezile unei relatii in permanenta dezvoltare ce poate constitui un exemplu pentru multe tari . Prietenia romano-turkmena are cele mai solide baze.

November 9, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, G20 Summit, Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, International Relation, Islam, Kazahstan, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Orient, OSCE-Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Politics, Religion, Romanian economy, Romanian Revolution, Turkmenistan, United Nations Global Compact, Universitati, Universities | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment