Centrul Diplomatic/Diplomatic Center

Centrul de Studii Politice si Diplomatie/ Center for Political Science and Diplomacy

TERAPIA DE SOC SAU LENINISMUL RASTURNAT AL LUI SACHS

Articol de Nina GEORGESCU                  E-mail : georgescu.nina@yahoo.fr

Redactor AGORAVOX-Franta                  Cercetator politic independent

 

  TERAPIA DE SOC SAU LENINISMUL RASTURNAT AL LUI SACHS

In anii 1989-1991 Socialismul din Europa de Est , inclusiv din URSS , a primit o grea lovitura subterana , care nu a fost inteleasa de o mare parte a populatiei tarilor din Est si nici din Vest deoarece aceasta lovitura era prezentata sub conceptul de Revolutie , iar acest concept are profunde rezonante pozitive in memoria umanitatii. Aceasta manevra politico-militara  desfasurata sub patronajul SUA si NATO care a condus la rasturnarea si distrugerea Socialismului european , pe care am numit-o  “ Razboiul secret din anii 1989-1991 “  si al carui nume de cod dat de CIA este  “ Covert Operation “ , a fost cea mai mare victorie a serviciilor secrete adversare ale Socialismului.   ( 1 ).

 Dupa metamorfozele politice impuse societatilor socialiste europene in anii 1989-1991 sub acoperirea de revolutii , intreaga Europa de Est se afla intr-o situatie bizara si bulversata. Emanatii asa-ziselor revolutii acaparasera puterea politica a acestor state.  Dar cati erau ei ?   Doar o mana de oameni in fiecare tara socialista.    Ramanea un puternic mod de productie sustinut de sute de milioane de oameni.   Si acest mod de productie se afla la baza societatii socialiste care existase pana atunci.  Trebuia deci sa se faca schimbari in modul de productie , in elementele lui componente , in relatiile de productie si in fortele de productie  pentru a determina schimbarea intregii suprastructuri , schimbarea vietii spirituale , etc.   Ramanea baza economica a societatii socialiste intemeiata pe proprietatea socialista asupra mijloacelor de productie si pe  relatiile de colaborare si ajutor reciproc.   Ramanea deci esenta societatii socialiste.   Aceasta era cea care trebuia schimbata , iar schimbarea nu se putea face peste noapte , ci intr-o anumita perioada de timp.   Nu s-a stabilit pentru aceasta perioada nici cat va dura , nici care vor fi cheltuielile nece-sare si nici in favoarea cui se face schimbarea.

J. Sachs- omul dupa ale carui planuri a fost distrusa economia Romaniei in anii `90 si ale carui planuri sunt reluate acum

 In scop manipulator , aceasta perioada a fost numita TRANZITIE de catre ocupantii straini si comisarii lor politici si autohtoni.  In realitate , in aceasta perioada de schimbari radicale si rapide a societatii  nu se poate vorbi de o tranzitie  in adevaratul sens al cuvantului , ci de o ruptura brutala de Socialism si de abdicare de la suveranitatea economica a tarilor est-europene. In plus , tranzitia de la sistemul socialist spre un alt sistem , ne numit , nu a fost prezentata ca o optiune natiunilor socialiste.   Trecerea s-a facut in mod abrupt , distrugandu-se structurile economice socialiste , fara ca acestea sa poata fi inlocuite cu structurile economiei de piata capitalista care nici macar nu incepusera sa aiba contur si fara a se preciza ca este vorba de transformarea radicala a societatii socialiste in societate capitalista primitiva. Ce a rezultat din aceste distrugeri ?    O  tranzitie ?   In aceasta situatie istoria ne dovedeste ca toate tranzitiile , toate trecerile de la un regim la alt regim , au asigurat o mai buna dezvoltare a condi -tiilor de viata ale populatiilor din tarile respective.   Fara aceasta finalitate , schimbarea unui sistem economic-social nu se justifica.

 In acest proces , impus cu viclenie , de transformare radicala a spatiului european socialist in spatiu capitalist , deci intr-o alta zona geopolitica , in care sunt implicate Statele Unite , tranzitia a avut ca baza teoretica , doctrinara , ideea liberala americana si engleza din anii ’80 , prezentata la acea epoca de Margaret Tacher si Ronald Reagan , care exprima , in fond , un neoliberalism extremist.

 In Romania si in celelalte tari socialiste europene , in urma abdicarii lor de la suveranitatea politica , atunci cand emanatii au acaparat puterea in stat , incepand din 1990 , neoliberalismul a fost introdus prin “Terapia de soc a lui SACHS”  (2)  si prin Consensul de la Washington  (3) , (4)    Dar si prin contributia originala romaneasca a acad. Tudorel POSTOLACHE cu privire la Calea HAOSULUI ,  considerata de el ca fiind singura alternativa pentru tranzitia la economia de piata. (5) ,  precum si prin Schita de Perspectiva a Romaniei adoptata de Guvernul Provizoriu condus de Petre ROMAN  la 20 aprilie 1990 (6)(7).

 Schita de Perspectiva a Romaniei nu a fost decat o viclenie pentru a se putea asuma , in mod ascuns , Planul lui SACHS. In aceasta Schita , in afara de liberalizarea preturilor , a comertului exterior , etc. , se mai propunea ca prima Lege a Parlamentului roman sa fie Legea Proprietatii , a privatizarii pe scara larga a bogatiei publice , fara consultarea cetatenilor prin referendum , ceea ce s-a si intamplat.  (8).

 Schita de Perspectiva a Romaniei a fost un model pentru orientarea nu numai a guvernelor din Romania  ci si a guvernelor din celelalte tari socialiste , care au avut ca scop remodelarea intregii vieti economice si sociale in conformitate cu obiectivele economice si politice strategice pe care le aveau Statele Unite in Europa de Est. Romania si-a asumat in mod disimulat Planul lui SACHS (9) pana in 1997 , cand , Programul de Guvernare a primit chiar numele de “Terapia de Soc” .    Celelalte guverne ale tarilor Europei de Est au adoptat  inca de la inceput  acest Plan in mod vizibil. Faptul de a se fi asumat calea HAOSULUI pentru tranzitia la economia de piata , precum si Planul lui SACHS , a avut ca rezultat oprirea brusca , imediata si rapida a rolului Statului in reglarea functionarii economiei.   Acesta a fost semnalul dat majoritatii guvernelor neoliberale occidentale si institutiilor economice financiare internationale , dar si agentilor economici ai Grupului  G  7  ,  ca au acum posibilitatea de a patrunde in regiunea Europei de Est , fara nici un efort  cu produsele si cu capitalul lor  sub pretextul  Terapiei de Soc , sub pretextul deschiderii fostelor tari socialiste spre globalizare si pentru o integrare rapida in Europa.

 In acest mod , Romania si intreaga Europa de Est a inceput sa traverseze o asa-zisa Tranzitie , conceputa dupa Planul profesorului de la Universitatea Harvard , Jeffrey SACHS , plan care a fost prezentat in studiul sau sub titlul semnificativ : “What is to be Done ?” , adica  “Ce-i de facut ?”  si lansat public de Revista  The Economist la 13 ianuarie 1990   (10) .

 Profesorul SACHS si-a scris studiul in acelasi stil ca LENIN , dar intr-o forma inversata .  Adica sa se renunte la colectivizarea marilor exploatatii agricole si sa fie faramitate , sa se renunte la industrializare si sa se faramiteze marea industrie , procese care vor determina abandonarea invatamantului de mase , renuntarea la  modernizare , la urbanizare , la cercetare.

Lenin- o neasteptata sursa de inspiratie pentru J. Sachs

Din aceasta cauza Americanii si Englezii au calificat aceasta idee a lui SACHS ca fiind o adevarata teza a Tranzitiei , pentru remodelarea vietii intregii regiuni a Europei de Est.  Profesorul de relatii internationale de la Universitatea Metropolitan din Londra , Peter GOWAN , in studiul sau  –  Teoria neoliberala si aplicarea ei in Europa de Est  –  arata ca  What is to be Done ?  al lui SACHS  corespunde unui Leninism rasturnat si precizeaza ca , citez ,  “ Studiul What is to be Done ?  nu este numai o chestiune de stil , el priveste intreaga metodologie a modelului lui SACHS pe care noi o putem numi Leninismul rasturnat al lui SACH “ (11) ,alias  Terapia de Soc.

 Se zice ca tarile socialiste ar fi solicitat chiar ele , din proprie initiativa , serviciile lui SACHS.   Ziarista Silvia BENEDETTI afirma intr-un articol , citez :  “Sachs , odata ajuns in tarile socialiste , a lucrat cu echipe locale discrete formate din aproximativ  10  tineri economisti pe care i-a format in colaborare cu Universitati pro-occidentale si cu sprijinul presei nationale.  Dotat cu calitati incontestabile de diplomat , SACHS a stiut sa teasa contacte privilegiate cu oameni politici cheie din cadrul guvernelor , dar el a refuzat intotdeauna sa fie platit de tarile socialiste pe care le-a consiliat.    (12).  Terapia de Soc a lui SACHS  este o teorie americana de laborator care nu a fost niciodata folosita.   A existat totusi o Terapie de Soc elaborata de Milton FRIEDMAN.   Acesta este primul economist american care a folosit termenul de Terapie de Soc in 1975 , la Santiago in Chile  si nu in Statele Unite.   Pana in 1975 nimeni nu folosise acest termen pentru o criza economica majora din lumea reala. Ziarista canadiana Noam KLEIN arata in cartea sa   “ Doctrina socului : Nasterea Capitalismului Dezastrelor”  ca terapia de soc a lui FRIEDMAN  potrivit careia o contractie subita va zgudui economia spre amelionare ,  nu a fost verificata. Cu privire la acest subiect Noam KLEIN mai arata ca exista o asemanare frapanta intre logica psihiatrilor din anii ’40 – ’50 , care recomandau pacientilor lor electrosocuri , fiind convinsi ca  inducerea deliberata de crize convulsive fortifiante reincarca in mod miraculos sistemul de operare al memoriei acestor pacienti.  (13).

 FRIEDMAN este economistul care l-a sfatuit pe PINOCHET , devenit seful Statului dupa eliminarea in 1973 a lui Salvador Allende , sa aplice in Chile , Terapia de Soc in economie. Pinochet si echipa lui de economisti  care studiasera in Statele Unite la Scoala din Chicago  este primul lider politic de pe planeta pamant care a testat Terapia de Soc in propria tara  transformand-o intr-un laborator pentru teoreticienii americani.

 Cotidianul The New-York Times scria in legatura cu acest subiect urmatoarele :  “Nu se intampla des ca unui economist de prim rang  ale carui perspective sunt atat de robuste  sa i se ofere sansa de a-si putea testa prescriptiile specifice pentru refacerea unei economii atat de bolnave.  Dar este si mai neobisnuit cazul cand Clientul respectivului economist este , din intamplare , o alta tara si nu propria sa tara.  (14).Terapia de Soc , afirma FRIEDMAN ,  este singurul “medicament”care trebuie administrat economiei bolnave.   Asa cum este prezentat in cartea sa Capitalism si Libertate ,  FRIEDMAN are in vedere trei obiective :  privatizarea masiva si rapida  ,  eliminarea controlului Guvernului asupra economiei  si  micsorarea cheltuielilor sociale. (15).     Toate aceste obiective , afirma FRIEDMAN  au scopul de a produce un adevarat miracol intr-o scurta perioada de timp , cu o recuperare ulterioara rapida. Noam KLEIN  arata in carte sa  “Doctrina Socului”  ca Pinochet trebuia sa actioneze rapid si decisiv.

 FRIEDMAN  insista asupra importantei SOCULUI ,  folosind acest cuvant in mod obsesiv  si subliniaza ca folosirea unei terapii graduale nu este o alegere buna.  (16).Miracolul economic promis de FRIEDMAN nu s-a produs.Din contra , in urma aplicarii Terapiei de Soc economia , care era deja in haos financiar in Chile  a aruncat tara in adevarate convulsii somaj , inflatie , etc. , care au inregistrat nivele alarmante. Junta lui PINOCHET  –  care adoptase metaforele lui FRIEDMAN care utilizau in mod obsesiv cuvantul de BOALA –  a sustinut ca Terapia de Soc este singura care lupta direct cu boala.  (17).

 Un exemplu tulburator de dezastru provocat , printre altele , de Terapia de Soc in Chile , a fost sistemul de asistenta sociala.In 1975 , seful Statului , Pinochet ,  si consilierul sau economic superior Sergio di Castro , au inceput sa distruga sistemul de asistenta sociala , reducand brusc cheltuielile de asistenta sociala cu 27 %.     Reducerea a fost continuata pana in 1980 cand aceste cheltuieli nu mai reprezentau decat jumatate in comparatie cu cele din perioada lui Allende.  (18). Noam KLEIN scrie in cartea sa ca sanatatea si educatia au fost cele mai greu lovite.   Chiar si Revista The Economist , care este considerata a fi revista economica a economiei de piata libera , referindu-se la aceste reduceri ale cheltuielilor sociale , le-a numit ca fiind    “o orgie a automutilarii”  (19).

 Teoria Terapiei de Soc , sau , Leninismul inversat al lui SACHS , care a fost aplicata in economiile socialiste ale Europei , este un instrument al Statelor Unite si al Occidentului pentru restaurarea Capitalismului in forma sa primitiva  in zona geopolitica a Europei de Est  –  fara sa se tina cont de experienta functionarii Capitalismului dezvoltat care exista in zilele noaste . Teoria Terapiei de Soc a lui SACHS , care a fost folosita in fostele tari socialiste ,  nu a produs o Tranzitie ,  asa cum se afirma in mod fals si inselator ,  ci a provocat o ruptura categorica de societatea socialista care a existat pana in 1990 ,  pentru a se exclude orice posibilitate de reinstaurare a Socialismului ca ideologie , ca doctrina , ca miscare sociala si ca sistem de organizare economic si social.

 BIBLIOGRAFIE :

  1. Nina Georgescu , Impotriva Manipularii – Razboiul secret din anul 1989 , Editura Total Publishing , Bucuresti , 2004

  2. Peter GOWAN , Teoria neoliberala si aplicarea ei in Europa

de Est , New Left Review no.213 , sept-oct.1995 , Apud

Societe et Culture 1996 , p.32

  1. Consensul de la Washington  –  vezi Internet

  2. Tudor Grosu , Cristian Socol ,  Economia Romaniei. Batalia

pentru tendinta. Integrarea in Uniunea Europeana.   Editura

Economica – Bucuresti – 2003 , p. 9-18.

  1. Echipa de sacrificiu. Din culisele guvernului post-revolutio-

nar 5 ian.1990 – 5 februarie 1991 , editat de « Romania azi »

SA Bucuresti , 1992 , p.17 ,  16-23.

  1. Ibidem.

  2. Schita privind strategia creerii economiei de piata in Romania , in vol. “Economia Romaniei , secolul XX” ,

coordonator academician Tudorel POSTOLACHE ,

Editura Academiei , Bucuresti , p.763 – 793.

  1. Ibidem , p.744-777  ,  777-779  ,  770-774.

  2. Ibidem , p.768 , Terapia de Soc , sau , Tranzitia graduala de

lunga durata.

10.  Peter GOWAN , op.cit. , p.32

11.  Ibidem

12.  Silvia Benedetti , articolul “Jeffrey Sachs – un visator pragmatic” , Inteligent com  ;  23/01/2005 , SUA

13.  Noam KLEIN ,  Doctrina Socului : Nasterea Capitalistilor

Dezastrelor  ,  Editura Vellant , Bucuresti , 2008 , p.87

Traducere din engleza de Bogdan Lepadatu si Ciprian Siulea

14.  Articol de Jonathan Kandell , “Chili , LAB TEST for a

Theorist” , New-York Times , 21 martie 1976 , Apud , Noam Klein , op.cit. p.90

15.  Noam Klein , op.cit. p.83

16.  Friedman et Friedman , Tow Luky Peuple , 592-594 , Apud

Noam Klein , op.cit. p.87

17.  Ministrul Finantelor numit de Junta militara , Jorge Caus , este autorul declaratiei Constable et Valenzuela , A Nation of Enmies , 173 , Apud Noam Klein , op.cit. p.88

18.  In 1980 cheltuielile publice pentru sanatate au scazut cu 27 % fata de 1970 , iar cheltuielile pentru educatie cu 11,3 % ,

Valdes , Pinochet’s , Economists , 23 , 26 , ; Constable et

Valenzuela , A Nation of Enemies , 172-173 ; Robert Harvey , “Chile’s Counter-Revolution” , The Economist ,

2 febr.1980 , Apud Noam Klein , op.cit. p.87

19. Noam Klein , op.cit. , p.87

Advertisements

August 25, 2010 Posted by | Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economia Romaniei, Economy, Educatie, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Foreign policy, History, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, International Relation, Latin America, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Politics, Religion, Romanian economy, Romanian Revolution, Russia, Russian Affairs, Socialism, United States, War Crimes | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FIDEL CASTRO TO OBAMA: DO NOT START A NUCLEAR WAR

A challenge to the US President by Fidel Castro

A few days now an article that contained a number of facts related to the oil spill that occurred 105 days ago was published. President Obama had authorized the drilling of that well because he trusted the capabilities of modern technology to produce oil –which he wanted to be available in abundance- thus relieving the United States of the dependence on the foreign supplies of such a vital product for the present civilization.  The excessive consumption of oil had already led to a vigorous protest by the environmentalists. Not even George W. Bush ever dared to take that step, given the bitter experience in Alaska with a tanker that carried the oil extracted from that area. The accident had occurred while searching for the product that is desperately needed in the consumers’ society that the newer generations inherited from the preceding ones, the only difference being that now everything moves at an unheard of speed. Scientists and environmentalists have explained the theories related to the catastrophes that occurred during hundreds of millions of years with the so called huge bubbles of methane that caused the gigantic tsunamis that swept across much of the planet.  Their winds, which reached twice the speed of sound, and their waves, which were 1 500 meters high killed 96 per cent of all living species.

They expressed their fear that in the Gulf of Mexico, which for some cosmic reason is the region of the planet where karstic rocks separate us from the enormous methane layer, the latter could be drilled, in this desperate quest for oil, with the very modern equipment used by the technology available today. After the oil spill caused by British Petroleum, the news agencies reported as follows:

“…The [US] Federal Government has warned people to keep away from the epicenter of operations, threatening to impose a 40 000 dollar fine for every transgression and carry out arrests in case there is any felonious act.

“…The EPA [The United States Environmental Protection Agency] has officially pointed out that Platform No. 1 is releasing methane, benzene, hydrogen sulphide and other toxic gases. Workers on the ground are now using modern protection means which include state- of- the art gas masks supplied by the military.”

Extremely transcendental events are becoming unusually frequent. The first and most imminent is the risk of a nuclear war after the sinking of the sophisticated flagship ‘Cheonan’ which, according to the South Korean government, was torpedoed from a Soviet-made submarine –both the torpedo and the submarine were manufactured more than 50 years ago- while other sources point to a unique possible and non-detectable cause: a mine planted by the US intelligence services on the Cheonan’s hull.  The government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea was soon to blame for that. This weird occurrence was followed a few days later by the adoption of Resolution 1929 of the UN Security Council, which called for an inspection of all Iranian merchant ships to begin in no later than 90 days.

A second event, which in part is already rendering its demolishing results, has been the progressive advance of  climate change, whose impact is even worse, which led to a denunciation contained in the documentary film “Home” produced by Yann Arthus-Bertrand with the participation of the most prestigious environmentalists of the world.  And now there is this oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a few miles away from our homeland, which has given rise to all sorts of concern. On July 20 a report by the EFE news agency referred to the statements made by the already well known Admiral Thad Allen, coordinator in charge of the oil spill cleanup in the Gulf of Mexico, who said he had authorized British Petroleum, the owner of the well and the one responsible for the spill, to continue for another 24 hours the tests to determine the soundness of the ‘Macondo’ structure after the installation, 10 days ago, of a new containment cap.” “According to official data, there are around 27 000 abandoned oil wells in the sea bed of the Gulf of Mexico…” “Ninety two days after the BP platform accident, the US government main concern is that the underground structure of the well is damaged and leaking oil through the rocks and flowing in multiple end points of the seafloor”It is the first time an official statement refers to the fear that the oil may start to emanate from the wells which are no longer productive.

Readers showing interest on the issue are now able to make a difference between the sensationalist and the scientific data. To me there is no satisfactory explanation for some facts.  Why Admiral Allen stated that “the main concern of the US Government is that the underground structure of the well is damaged and leaking oil through the rocks and flowing in multiple end points of the seafloor?   Why did BP state it can not be blamed for the crude that gushed 15 kilometers far from the blown out well? We will have to wait another 15 days for a relief well to be drilled, following a trajectory that is almost in parallel with the one that caused the spill, at a distance of no less than 5 meters one from the other, according to the Cuban group that analyzes the problem. Meanwhile we, as well educated children, should keep on waiting. If there is so much confidence in the well in parallel, why didn’t they resort to that measure before? What shall we do next if that action fails, as it has happened with all others?

In a recent exchange I held with a person too well informed about the details of the accident, given his country’s interests, I learned that because of the characteristics and the situation around the well, in that case there is no risk of a methane emanation there. No news on the subject was published on July 23. On the 24th, the news agency DPA stated that a “prominent US scientist had accused British Petroleum of bribing the experts that investigate the oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico to delay the publication of data, as was denounced by the scientist to the BBC network”, but it establishes no connection between that immorality and any possible damage in the structure of the sea floor, the oil emanations and the unusual levels of methane. On July 26, London’s most important media –BBC, Sunday Times, Sunday Telegraph, among others- reported that the “Board of Directors” of British Petroleum would “discuss today the timing of Chief Executive Hayward exit “over his handling of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.” Notimex and El Universal of Mexico published that British Petroleum “…has not decided on any change among its executives”, and adds that “a meeting of the Board of Directors is due to take place this afternoon.” On the 27th, news agencies reported that the British Petroleum Chief Executive had been fired.

July 28: Twelve wire services and 14 countries, among them the US and several of its most important allies, made some embarrassing statements over the publication by Wikileaks of secret documents about the war in Afghanistan. Although Barack Obama admitted to be ‘concerned’ about the leak, […] he pointed out that the information is old and contained nothing new.”

That was a cynical statement.

“The founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, said that the documents are an evidence of the war crimes committed by the US troops.”

And they evidenced them so accurately that they have shaken the very foundations of American secrecy.  Such documents refer to the “deaths of civilians, which were never accounted for publicly”. This has created conflicts among the parties involved in the commission of such atrocities.As for the risks of methane emanations from the wells that are not in production, there is a complete silence. July 29: AFP reports the unimaginable.  Osama Bin Laden used to be a man of the US intelligence services:  “…Osama Bin Laden appears in the secret reports published by Wikileaks as an agent that is active, present and praised by his men in the Afghan-Pakistani border.”It was known that, during the Afghan war against the Soviet occupation, Osama collaborated with the United States, but the whole world thought that in his struggle against the foreign invasion he had accepted the support offered by the United States and NATO out of necessity and that, after that country was liberated, he refused foreign interference and created Al Qaeda to combat the United States.

Many countries, Cuba among them, condemn his terrorist methods which do not exclude the death of countless innocent victims. Just imagine how surprised the world’s public opinion was when it learned that Al Qaeda had been a creation of the government of that country.It was the justification used to launch the war on the Taliban in Afghanistan and one of the motives, among others, for the invasion and occupation of Iraq by the US troops later on.  These have been two countries where thousands of American youths have been killed and a great number of them have been maimed.  More than 150 000 American soldiers –joined by the members of the units of the belligerent NATO and other allies such as Australia and South Korea- have been indefinitely deployed in these two countries.

On July 29, the picture of a 22 year-old American youth, Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst who leaked 240 000 classified documents to the website Wikileaks, was published. He has not pleaded guilty or innocent. However, nobody will be able to lay a finger on him.  The Wikileaks members have sworn they will spread the truth throughout the world. On July 30, the Brazilian theologian Frei Betto published an article entitled “Grito de la Tierra, Clamor de los Pueblos” (Cry of the Earth; Clamor of the Peoples).Two paragraphs summarize the essence of its content: “The Greeks of ancient times had already noticed it: Gaia, the Earth, is a living organism.  We all come from it, after 13 700 million years of evolution.  However, during the last 200 years, we have not learned how to take care of it; we turned it into a merchandise in exchange for which we hope to get maximum profits.” “Today, all forms of life in the planet, including the human species –two thirds of the world population survive under the poverty line- and the Earth itself are threatened.  To prevent the anticipation of the Apocalypse it is necessary to question the myths of modern times –such as market, development, nation States- all of them based on an instrumental rationale.”

On that same day, AFP published the following: “The People’s Republic of China disapproves of the unilateral sanctions adopted by the European Union against Iran, said today  Juang Yu, the spokesperson of the Chinese chancellery.” Likewise, Russia strongly protested against the condemnations that resulted from the sanctions adopted by that region that is in close alliance with the United States. On July 30, AFP reported that the Minister of Defense of Israel stated the following: “The sanctions that the United Nations adopted against Iran […] will not force that country to suspend its uranium enrichment activities aimed at manufacturing an atom bomb.”

On August 1st, AFP reported that “a top military official of the Guardians of the Revolution warned the United States today against a future attack against Iran.”“Israel did not rule out the possibility of a military action against Iran aimed at halting its nuclear program.”“The international community headed by Washington recently increased its pressure on Iran, which is accused of trying to equip itself with a nuclear weapon by means of a covert civil nuclear program.”“Javani’s assertions preceded a statement by the Chief of the US Joint Chiefs of Staffs, Michael Mullen, who reaffirmed this Sunday that the US has a plan to attack Iran to prevent it from getting nuclear weapons.”On August 2, a news published  by AFP, whose content was similar to the ones published by all other news agencies, read as follows:

“I have to travel to New York on September to attend the UN General Assembly.  I am ready to sit down with Obama, face to face, man to man, to talk freely about world issues in front of the media and find the best solution”, said Ahmadinejad during a speech broadcast by state television.”“But President Ahmadinejad warned that the dialogue should be based on mutual respect.”

“If they think they can swing around a wand and tell us that we should accept everything they say, this will never happen”, he added.  Western powers ‘do not understand that things have changed in the world’, he said.”

“You are supporting a country that has hundreds of atomic bombs; but you say you want to stop Iran, which could eventually have them some day…”The Iranians have declared that they would shoot one hundred missiles against each of the US and Israel ships that  blockade Iran as soon as they start inspecting an Iranian merchant ship.Thus, by the time Obama gives the order to comply with the Security Council Resolution, he would also be ordering the sinking of all US warships in that area.

No other US President has been faced with such a dramatic decision.  He should have foreseen that.

On this ocassion, for the first time in my life, I address myself to Barack Obama, the President of the United States:

You should know that it is in your power to offer humankind the only real possibility of peace.  Only once will you be able to make use of your prerogatives to give the order to open fire.It is quite possible that later on, after this traumatic experience, the solutions found will not lead us again to this apocalyptical situation. Every citizen in your country, even your worst left wing or right wing adversaries, will most certainly appreciate it, as will the people of the United States, which is in no way to blame for the situation created.I am asking you to deign to listen to this appeal  I am making to you on behalf of the Cuban people.

I understand that a quick response is not to be expected; nor will you ever give one.  Think it over and consult your specialists; ask your most powerful international allies and adversaries for their opinion about the subject.

I am not interested in honors or glory. Just do it! The world could truly get rid of both nuclear and conventional weapons.

The worst variant of all will be a nuclear war, which is already virtually inevitable.

PREVENT IT! 

Fidel Castro Ruz

August 3, 2010

August 9, 2010 Posted by | Al Quds, Bertrand Russell Tribunal, Blackseanews Agency, Diplomacy, Ecology, Economy, Environment, European Council on International Relations, Fidel Castro, Foreign policy, History, Ierusalim - Al Quds, Informations, Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation, International Relation, Islam, Latin America, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Orient, Palestine, Politics, Religion, Russia, Russian Affairs, United Nations Global Compact, United States, War Crimes | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FEMEIA MUSULMANA DE INFLUENTA EUROPEANA AR PUTEA FI O ROMANCA

CONFERINTA FEMEIA MUSULMANA IN EUROPA – SOLUTII PENTRU O VIATA ECHILIBRATA organizata de Asociatia Surorilor Musulmane din Romania a ajuns la sfarsit. Conferinta a oferit prilejul rar al dezbaterii unor teme de maxima importanta pentru comunitatea musulmana din Europa si din Romania. Asociatia Surorilor Musulmane din Romania condusa de inimoasa doamna Sevinci Gemaledin a stiut sa ofere evenimentului o organizare de exceptie.  Printre  invitatii de marca care au raspuns invitatiei de a dezbate asupra conditiei femeii musulmane in societatea europeana putem enumera pe doamna profesor dr. Aishah Bilhijar – Preşedinta Forumului International al Femeilor Musulmane, domnul profesor dr. Anton Caragea, directorul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica, profesorul George Grigore , traducatorul Coranului in limba romana , doamna drd. Alina Isac si mult altii. Conferinta s-a distins nu doar prin invitatii proeminenti dar si temele variate ce au atins subiecte relevante si acute precum:  Femeia musulmană – parte din Europa (Av. Famile Fatma Arslan ) ,  Dialogul islamo-crestin: eşec sau succes? (George Grigore, Ambasador al Aliantei Civilizatiilor pentru Romania ) ,  Femeia musulmană în Europa: pastrator al traditiilor si valorilor islamului ( Prof.dr.Anton Caragea ) , Educația copilului în România (Dr. Abu Al-Ola Al-Ghaithy ), Cauzele academice ale incapacitatii de intelegere a statutului femeii musulmane  ( Drd. Alina Isac ).

D-na Sevinci Gemaledin , organizatoarea Conferintei FEMEIA MUSULMANA

Confeirnta s-a bucurat de participarea a peste 160 de membre ale Asociatiei Surori Musulmane, jurnalisti , academicieni, profesori, activiste feministe , cercetatori etc demonstrand importanta evenimentului, receptarea de catre societatea romaneasca a necesitatii unei astfel de dezbateri si perfecta organizare.

Crema comunitatii musulmane din Romania a raspuns la apelul Asociatiei Surorilor Musulmane

Faptul ca o astfel de conferinta a putut fi organizata la o tinuta europeana de catre o asociatie  romanesca demonstreaza nu doar maturitatea Asociatiei Surorilor Musulmane dar si a societatii civile romanesti si importanta crescanda a comunitatii musulmane din Romania nu doar in plan intern dar si international. Aceasta crestere in importanta si relevanta la scara intregului continent a comunitatii musulmane din Romania a fost confirmata si de doamna avocat Famile Fatma Arslan  din Olanda care a propus-o pe organizatoarea romana a conferintei,  doamna Sevinci Gemaledin, pentru titlul de Femeia Musulmana de Influenta Europeana ceea ce este o onoare deosebita pentru tara noastra fiind pentru prima data cand un cetatean roman este propus la aceasta distinctie.

Avocata Famile Fatma Arslan  din Olanda

Desfasurarea cu succes a acestei importante conferinte a demonstrat valoarea organizatiilor de femei din Romania si a comunitatii musulmane ca factor de organizare si imagine pozitiva a Romaniei in Europa.      

Profesor dr. Anton Caragea, director Institutul de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica si prof. dr. George Grigore      

August 2, 2010 Posted by | Al Quds, Blackseanews Agency, Comunitatea Musulmana din Romania, Diplomacy, Eastern Europe, Ecology, Economy, Educatie, Foreign policy, History, Ierusalim - Al Quds, Informations, International Relation, Islam, Leaders, Mass media, News, Open Letter, Politics, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment