Centrul Diplomatic/Diplomatic Center

Centrul de Studii Politice si Diplomatie/ Center for Political Science and Diplomacy


2010 has being an important year for Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as the only chance for a survival of this important organization, legacy of cold war, had being played out.

Professor dr. Anton Caragea – President of Bucharest Conference on OSCE-24 February 2010

The Kazakhstan Presidency of OSCE had come in a difficult time for the organization. OSCE has being one of the main results of the Final Declaration of Helsinki Conference, designed to create a forum for continuous dialogue between the communist powers and capitalist powers.

Opening of Bucharest Conference on OSCE-24 February 2010

The long period of the Cold War had seen important moments of tension between the two opposite power`s : USSR and United States, having as center the European continent: Berlin Blockade, Berlin Wall, 1956- Hungary Revolution, 1968- Czechoslovakia Revolution etc.

These continuous tensions, on the fringes of European continent and the issue of the frontiers drawn after the Second World War, needed a platform for dialogue and mutual understanding between the Cold War adversaries.

The CSCE ( The Council for Security and Cooperation in Europe ), as it was the former name of OSCE, had succeeded in this task of providing a rostrum for declarations, dialogue and détente between the irreconcilable adversaries of the cold war.

The period after the collapse of the communist system in Europe assured, after the extinction of Warsaw Treaty, a new period of glory for CSCE.

Re-named as OSCE, the organization provided a formula for democratic support tor former communist states and a dialogue and security forum, in a changing world, until the NATO decided to expand and include former communist satellite from Eastern Europe.

From this moment, the downfall of the organization had being sharply and rapid. The last of the summits, held in 1999 in Istanbul, failed to offer a new conceptual reconstruction of the OSCE and failed even to open the opportunity for a new high level summit of the organization.

The agreement for putting OSCE in a shadow corner was clearly marked , for NATO and United States the organization become superfluous and un-necessary. The security of the European countries become a task for the armed arm of the western world: NATO and the economic and human dimension was entrusted to European Union expansion.

For Russia, OSCE had become guilty of becoming an anti-chamber of the NATO expansion and was perceived as a fostering tool for promoting the dismantling of the former Soviet Union, under the name banner of promoting a so called democracy.

In 2010, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe was confronted with the lack of vision, lack of concept and was victim of an extensive period without a high level meeting, from 1999.

The Kazakhstan Presidency was confronted with a negative perception. The promoters of a special kind of democracy where discussing the Kazakhstan track record in fulfilling a hypothetical democracy scale. Other countries, after a failed mandate at the presidency of OSCE, where not to eager to offer to a new comer a red carpet treatment.

Finally, the organization was confronted with a lack of resources and visionary leadership and controlled by a conservative state of mind: if we did not need a high level summit for 10 years why we will need one now? If we survive without a reform, why we need a reform today? This where the question`s whispered on the diplomatic corridors of power.

 In this important moment, Kazakhstan leadership decided to commit resources and interest in offering to OSCE the example of an efficient and active chairmanship, engaging the creativeness of European intellectual elite in an ample debate to renew the concept and vision of OSCE.

The appeal of president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev, presented in Vienna to European elite was clear and un-equivocal: the reform of OSCE and enabling a new vision for the organization, could only result in a common effort of the progressive intellectual`s and leaders of Europe.

In this moment I have taken the decision to uphold the Kazakhstan Presidency to OSCE and to nurture an intellectual and academic response to the challenge presented by President Nazarbayev.

President Emil Constantinescu at Bucharest Conference on OSCE-24 February 2010

The initial discussion was concentrated with President of Romania (1996-2000), the fine and impressive intellectual Emil Constantinescu.

President Emil Constantinescu, with his ample European vision had embraced the idea of a coagulated Romanian and European response to OSCE reform challenge.

 Together we have shaped the vision of two main ideas that must be emphasized in a Bucharest conference on OSCE: the support for a high level meeting of OSCE and the highlighting of the main topics for a future reform of OSCE.

With this discussion, the European elite response to OSCE challenge, mounted by the president of Kazakhstan had started to gather essence.

 Soon afterwards President of Romania (1990-1996; 2000-2004) Ion Iliescu had accepted to attend and support a Bucharest conference on OSCE.

President Ion Iliescu at Bucharest Conference on OSCE-24 February 2010

With the presence of two presidents, that supervised the transformation of OSCE after the Cold War and had supported the last high level gathering of OSCE in Istanbul, the European reform project for OSCE had become a major conceptual work of ″renovatio″ (re-building).

Along the ambitious project, the presence of the economic community, in this reform debate had imposed as a necessity. OSCE needs a powerful economic impact, need an economic overhaul and also must become an economic center of attraction. Mr. Cezar Coraci had entrusted himself with the task of creating an OSCE economic agenda that would transform the organization in a motor for growth and development.

Concluding Bucharest Conference on OSCE-24 February 2010

The diplomatic community of Europe, under the leadership of Professor Dr. Mircea Constantinescu, Director of European Diplomatic Academy, had also created a draft for a human security dimension of OSCE.

A strong reform project, supported by all the speakers of Bucharest conference on OSCE included: the necessity of reforming the so called democracy promotion arm of OSCE, creating a true and honest democracy framework and offering a new peace and security concept for the Euro-Asian region.

Finally, with their impressive moral and political authority Presidents Emil Constantinescu and Ion Iliescu offered their support for a high level meeting of OSCE in Astana.

In the concluding coverage of the Bucharest conference on OSCE the main international press outlets considered that Astana High Level Conference of OSCE it is now a necessity.

The long trail of shadow and mistrust in Kazakhstan Presidency had being defeated and the intellectual and political support of European elite had clearly shined thru.

The President of Kazakhstan decision had played off; Europe had supported his ambitious vision, supported a High level conference in Astana, defeated the mistrust and misunderstanding and created an agenda for reform of OSCE. Kazakhstan president had obtained a full support in his plans to reform OSCE.

 I must also emphasize that Bucharest Conference on OSCE had started a special relation between Romania and Kazakhstan.

Romania had never forgotten that Kazakhstan had the ambition to reform OSCE, to promote an agenda of security at Euro-Asia level and had trusted the Romanian elite to coagulate a European response to Kazakhstan initiative for a new OSCE.

The ideas and the reform plans conceptualized in Bucharest conference on OSCE had become the main issues on the table of the High level meeting in Astana in 1-2 December 2010.

The voices of Romanian and European elite had crossed the space and become the main back bone of the reform of OSCE.

The lesson of the successful European-Asian cooperation of Bucharest Conference on OSCE from 24 February 2010 remain vivid today : OSCE could retained his efficiency, could become one more time a pillar of security and could rediscover his legacy of promoting human rights and authentic democracy.

 Romania had started a strategic relation in the benefit of European unity and stability and in forging ties with Asia via Kazakhstan.

This strategic and visionary relation continuous today and the journey for creating a new world of peace and security with the support of Romania and Kazakhstan is a never ending story.

Professor Dr. Anton Caragea MA, FINS, EDA


October 23, 2012 Posted by | Diplomacy, Economy, Foreign policy, History, Informations, International Relation, Leaders, Mass media, News, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


On 23th of September 2012 the taking office protocol and presentation meeting, between Prof. Dr. Anton Caragea, Director of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation and H.E. Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi, Ambassador of State of Qatar in Romania had taken place.

 Prof. Dr. Anton Caragea, Director of Institute of International Relations and Economic Cooperation and H.E. Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi, Ambassador of State of Qatar in Romania

Prof.dr.Anton Caragea express his heartfelt  congratulation on the occasion of Qatar appointing a new ambassador in Romania , appreciating that Qatar could be an important economic and political partner of dialogue for Romania in Middle East region.

The Romania- Qatar  relationship has the ability to become an example of building an economic and cultural exchange area between Romania and Middle East .

Now it is an auspicious moment for constructing with energy and commitment this dialogue and friendship between Romania and Qatar, stated professor dr. Anton Caragea, as the level of bilateral expectations is great and the political and economic environment is favorable for this expansion of activities.

H.E. Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi had expressed his appreciation for the encouragement`s offered by prof.dr.Anton Caragea and had stated that the vision of a economic, politic and cultural special relationship between Romanian and Qatar is a common shared vision.

The dialogue had continued on concrete proposals of economic, political and cultural bilateral relations and on ways of fostering this dialogue on to the future.

The main topics had concentrated on increasing the bilateral trade volume and fostering the investments, promoting tourism and developing the economical connection`s.

Tabled at the meeting were also actions such as: expanding tourist connections and fully exploiting Qatar tourist potential, launching a program of cultural exchanges.

The friendly dialogue constitutes a promise for constructing a more robust romanian diplomatic presence towards Qatar in the nearest future.

October 8, 2012 Posted by | Diplomacy, Economy, Foreign policy, History, Informations, International Relation, Leaders, Mass media, News, Politics | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


In data de 23 septembrie 2012 a avut loc intrevederea protocolara, de prezentare,  intre prof.dr.Anton Caragea , Directorul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica  si domnul Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi, Ambasadorul Statului Qatar in Romania.

 Prof.dr.Anton Caragea , Directorul Institutului de Relatii Internationale si Cooperare Economica  si domnul Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi, Ambasadorul Statului Qatar in Romania

Prof.dr.Anton Caragea a prezentat felicitarile sale,  cu ocazia preluarii mandatului de ambasador in Romania de catre Excelenta Sa Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi , apreciind ca Statul Qatar  poate fi un important partener economic si politic pentru Romania in zona Orientului Mijlociu.

Relatia intre Romania si Qatar  are posibilitatea de a fi un exemplu, pentru construirea unei zone de schimburi culturale si economice intre Romania si zona Orientului Mijlociu.

Exista acum momentul propice pentru a construi un dialog bilateral sustinut si a obtine consolidarea lui la nivelul asteptarilor celor doua popoare, a apreciat prof.dr.Anton Caragea , deoarece exista atat vointa politica bilaterala, clar subliniata,  cat si cadrul economic si legislativ necesar acestei dezvoltari.

Excelenta Sa  Domnul Sad Mohamed Sad Al-Kobaisi a multumit pentru incurajarile venite din partea Prof.dr.Anton Caragea  si a apreciat ca viziunea din partea qatareza este similara : Romania trebuie sa se constituie economic, cultural si politic intr-un partener de prim rang in relatia cu Qatarul.

Dialogul a continuat pe teme concrete, de analiza a stadiului prezent al relatiilor economice, politice si culturale dintre cele doua tari si a metodelor practice de dezvoltare a acestora in viitor.

Principalele teme au vizat: cooperarea economica, facilitarea investitiilor, dezvoltarea cooperarii turistice , mai buna exploatare a potentialului turistic din Qatar si lansarea schimburilor culturale bilaterale.

Dialogul prietenesc, plin de caldura sufleteasca a pus bazele  unei mandat de succes pentru dezvoltarea unei relatiei intre Romania si Qatar si promite lansarea unei dialog robust din punct de vedere diplomatic si economic intre Romania si Qatar.

October 8, 2012 Posted by | Diplomacy, Economy, Foreign policy, History, Informations, International Relation, Leaders, Mass media, News, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment